home > by publication type > daily analysis > Russia and the Frozen Wars
Email
| Prepared by: | Lionel Beehner |
|---|
Armenian Defense Minister Serzh Sarkisian doesn't look hopeful about resolving the dispute over Nagorno-Karabakh. (AP/Karen Minasian)
Separation anxiety abounds in the former Soviet Union. The empire's dissolution led to turmoil in parts of the north and south Caucasus, and the status of a number of important enclaves remains unsettled. Some call for more autonomy from Moscow, while others want closer ties. As on-and-off wars in Chechnya, Nagorno-Karabakh, and northern Georgia illustrate, at times, these so-called "frozen conflicts" have heated up; more often, though, they simmer beneath the surface, leaving restless nationals in their wake. Experts agree on one thing: The road to resolve these conflicts goes through Moscow.
Yet with ethnic Albanian Kosovars calling for independence from Serbia, Russia finds itself in a bind, writes Chris Stephen of the Institute for War and Peace Reporting. On one hand, Moscow supports, both with money and manpower, the struggles of separatists in Moldova's Trans-Dniester and Georgia's Abkhazia and South Ossetia regions. Yet there is an obvious "wariness about encouraging separatism elsewhere." Russians are worried that if Chechnya breaks away from the federation, then Dagestan, Tatarstan, and other Russian republics would follow in domino-like fashion. Not to mention Russia does not want to anger its best friend in the Balkans, Serbia, which refuses to accept statehood for Kosovo.
For its part, Georgia is keen to come to an understanding with Russia on its separatist problems. The leaders who took office after the Rose Revolution struck a quick deal with Russia to resolve problems with the breakaway Ajaria region but Moscow-Tbilisi ties have deteriorated with Georgia's unification push. Moscow has jacked up the price of its gas, as well as embargoed exports like Georgian wine and mineral water. Relations are also tense over Tbilisi's bid to join NATO. Yet Georgia can ill afford to provoke Moscow because, as the Economist reports, "it would in effect be war against Russia."
These frozen conflicts have far-reaching ramifications beyond their immediate regions. Many of them (Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia) are situated on important energy corridors. That partially explains recent Western calls for an international police force to monitor northern Georgia and the $295 million grant doled out by the U.S. Millennium Challenge Corporation. Meanwhile, Trans-Dniester remains a popular route for traffickers of drugs, arms, and sex workers (BBC).
Perhaps the most potentially hazardous of these conflicts is Nagorno-Karabakh. Ethnic Armenians took control of the enclave and a chunk of Azerbaijan in 1993 after a war that killed some 25,000 people and displaced hundreds of thousands. "This barely frozen conflict threatens a hot war that would devastate the region," write Ana Palacio and Daniel Twining in the Washington Post. They propose a "mini-Marshall Plan" to remove Russian bases from the southern Caucasus and end outstanding sanctions by some Western states against Azerbaijan.
Vladimir Socor of the Jamestown Foundation says Moscow has a "major incentive" to leave conflicts unresolved, knowing the West will not be interested in strategic partnerships "with rumps of countries that are open to Russian-orchestrated pressures" (Word doc). Hence, Russia's preferred strategy is to maintain the status quo, writes Nicu Popescu of the Centre for European Policy Studies. "The conflicts are not frozen at all," he says. "It is their settlement that is frozen."
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.