Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Chinese Train Carries Controversy
| Prepared by: | Carin Zissis |
|---|
A Tibetan woman stands near the tracks of the new railway in Lhasa. (AP/Elizabeth Dalziel)
With much fanfare, China opened the world's highest railroad (AP) connecting Beijing with the Tibetan capital of Lhasa, on July 1, the Chinese Communist Party anniversary. An engineering feat, the high-tech train reaches heights of more than 16,500 feet and carries passengers in sealed cars pumped with oxygen across the frozen Himalayas. But two months after its inauguration, the train is already experiencing trouble. Cracks have appeared in concrete bridges and the railbed is proving unstable in certain areas (RFE/RL); one passenger has already died from altitude sickness (The Standard).
Beijing's development in Tibet, part of its "March toward Modernization" policy, is having its own set of problems. Chinese President Hu Jintao called the opening of the train line a historic opportunity for economic and social development in the region (Xinhua). But the Wall Street Journal reports that Chinese entrepreneurs hoping to start business ventures offered by the railway, which is expected to bring 800,000 visitors to Tibet each year, are meeting with local resistance. Activists have demonstrated against the train line, claiming it threatens Tibetan culture by increasing the flow of ethnic Han Chinese to the area (BosGlobe). The International Campaign for Tibet offers a history of Beijing's policy on Han migration with the aim of assimilating Tibetans into China.
Beijing's impatience with development in Tibet is evidenced by recent official and media outbursts against the exiled Dalai Lama, says Howard French of the New York Times. Since 1998, the Dalai Lama has proposed a "Middle Way" approach in which Tibet would have a democratically elected government but remain part of China. Yet in a recent Der Spiegel interview, Zhang Quigli, the new Communist Party chief in Tibet, calls the religious leader a "splittist" who "deceived his motherland" and will only be allowed to negotiate his return when he "declares to the world that he has given up claims to independence for Tibet." Isabel Hilton writes in the Guardian that the Tibetan monk's influence is of such great concern to Beijing that when Tibetans gathered for public fur burnings after he called for an end to wearing animal skins in January, the Chinese government responded by ordering its broadcasters to wear fur. Hilton says the recent tensions between the exiled monk's supporters and the Chinese authorities are causing "cracks in the official Chinese narrative of unity and harmony between Tibet and China." During the Dalai Lama's recent trip to Mongolia, Chinese authorities stated they are opposed to any country allowing him a political platform for his views on Beijing's policy (BBC).
As GlobalSecurity.org explains, though the Dalai Lama was awarded the 1989 Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts, Western nations have been hesitant to condemn China's policies in Tibet for fear of harming their own relations with Beijing. A U.S. State Department report expresses continued concern over human rights abuses in Tibet.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
