home > by publication type > daily analysis > Trade in the Balance
Email
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Farm subsidies are a barrier to global trade talks. (AP/Seth Perlman)
The Doha trade round is not dead yet, although a summer of heightened discontent may have made it appear so. Even at this late date, with no breakthrough in sight, major players in global trade are scrambling to salvage the five-year-old negotiations, once promised as a lifeline for scores of developing nations (AP). Finance ministers of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum, whose members account for nearly half of global trade, have vowed to restart the talks. A twenty-nation bloc of emerging-market states met in Brazil at the weekend, joined by top U.S. and European trade representatives. They reached no agreement on resumption of Doha talks because of a continued impasse over agriculture subsidies, but there was a general hope that talks would revive after U.S. midterm elections in November (NYT). Australia is also hosting a meeting of key trade states on September 20-22. World Trade Organization (WTO) chief Pascal Lamy just concluded a trip to China, where he pressed the trade colossus to play a more constructive role in reviving the Doha talks (AFX).
The flurry of activity is seen as a last-ditch effort to rescue the Doha talks (McClatchy). All sides are keenly aware that U.S. presidential trade-promotion authority will soon expire, which could sideline the main catalyst in eight previous multilateral rounds of negotiations. Those rounds resulted in a steady lowering of barriers over fifty years and the creation of the WTO. The removal of barriers in the current round could lead to hundreds of billions of dollars in annual global gains, say groups like the World Bank. A failure of Doha raises concerns that a "backlash against globalization (FT) will generate more protectionism in the [leftover] vacuum,” writes C. Fred Bergsten, director of the Institute for International Economics. A new CFR Critical Policy Choice report urges President Bush to commit the political capital to reach a successful conclusion to Doha. Author Daniel W. Drezner acknowledges the domestic risks involved but argues that just as trade liberalization proved an effective Cold War strategy, “trade expansion can and should be presented as a critical element of the long-term grand strategy of the United States to defeat terrorists and spready democracy."
Reason magazine’s Managing Editor Jesse Walker takes a dim view of the Bush administration’s political will: “Asked to choose between freedom and the farm lobby, Washington will opt for agribusiness almost every time.” Congressman James Kolbe (R-AZ), chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Foreign Operations, is another critic of farm subsidies. “It makes zero sense to wipe out the benefits of U.S. foreign assistance in order to keep paying our farmers to be inefficient,” he writes in the Washington Post. Washington has offered to cut its agricultural subsidies by an average of more than 50 percent, conditioned on reciprocal EU moves. But the European Union and other parties are pressing for further cuts. Some trade experts worry that in the absence of a global trade breakthrough, the United States will lead the charge toward what they say are trade-distorting bilateral agreements, a trend outlined in this Backgrounder. But the crowded political agenda in Congress ahead of November’s midterm elections will make it tough to push through approval (LAT) of even modest pacts with Peru, Colombia, and Oman.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.