Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > U.S.-South Korea: Uneasy Allies
| Prepared by: | Carin Zissis |
|---|
Roh visits the White House this week.
With South Korean President Roh Moo-Hyun’s visiting the White House this week with President Bush, some commentators say the longstanding alliance between the two nations needs mending. The two sides agreed in advance of the meeting not to issue (Korea Times) any joint declarations at the conclusion of summit, but they did concur on the importance of Six-Party Talks with North Korea, transferring control of their combined forces, and forging a trade deal. So far, Washington and Seoul have made little progress in their proposed bilateral free trade agreement (Seattle Times), which would be the most far-reaching trade deal since the North American Free Trade Agreement. Another thorny issue involves the timing for the United States to hand over wartime control of U.S.-South Korean combined forces (Stars and Stripes).
But the divide between Bush’s and Roh’s approaches to handling North Korea is the most contentious issue for the alliance. During the Asia-Europe meeting in Helsinki last week, Roh cautioned against making too much of the North Korean nuclear threat out of fear of damaging inter-Korean relations, saying Pyongyang’s missile tests in July were not evidence of a military danger (Korea Times). Meanwhile, the State Department’s Christopher Hill, in Shanghai before heading to Seoul, said North Korea would get no further incentives (BBC) to take part in Six-Party Talks regarding its nuclear plan.
This Backgrounder looks at the history of and recent tensions affecting the U.S.-South Korean alliance. Richard C. Bush III of the Brookings Institution offers his roundup of topics and desired outcomes of the summit, including a coordination of U.S.-Korean policy on China and Japan. Blogger Walter Hendler says the two countries are “in the initial stages of a divorce process” caused by generational shifts, changing perspectives on the alliance (OhmyNews), South Korea’s changing attitude toward North Korea, and the emergence of China as the leading power in the region. Stanford University’s Daniel Sneider, writing in the Washington Post, disputes the notion that the U.S.-South Korean alliance went through a golden age, claiming it “is a mythical past that stands in the way of repairing our alliance today.” The Economist says North Korea is the main issue causing the current turbulence in the U.S.-South Korea alliance; some U.S. officials say Seoul is too soft on Pyongyang, while President Roh depicts the handover of combined forces from the United States to South Korea as a matter of national sovereignty (Subscription Only).
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has said the United States may cede wartime control of the combined forces as early as 2009 (Reuters). The joint wartime force was established in 1978 to discourage North Korean aggression, and its command lies in the hands of the 30,000-strong U.S. Force Korea (USFK), stationed in South Korea since 1953. Michael O’Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, says it would be a “mistake” for the United States to give up its role as leader of the military alliance because, if a conflict began, having a divided force in a common battle area could result in tactical confusion (Washington Times). Not all South Koreans see it as a good idea, either. An editorial in the conservative Chosun Ilbo warns Roh will go down in history as a traitor if Seoul suffers at the hands of North Korea because of the president’s push for the transfer of military control and withdrawal of USFK troops. The Hankyoreh, a Seoul-based progressive newspaper, says 700 South Korean intellectuals who signed a joint statement against the transfer should instead concern themselves with how to “build a future for a unified Korea.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
