home > by publication type > daily analysis > Nuclear Rumblings from N. Korea
Email
| Prepared by: | Carin Zissis |
|---|
Kim Jong-Il has announced his intentions to conduct missile tests. (AP)
World leaders condemned a North Korean nuclear test threat (Reuters Video), which Pyongyang claims is necessary in the face of U.S. hostility. A government statement did not disclose a date for what would be Pyongyang’s first known nuclear test, but said North Korea was compelled to follow through (Yonhap) with the test because of the “U.S. extreme threat of a nuclear war and sanctions and pressure.” Christopher Hill, the top U.S. State Deparment official on Asia-Pacific relations, gave Pyongyang a stern warning: “We are not going to live with a nuclear North Korea, we are not going to accept it.” The White House said a test would threaten East Asian security and that the United States will work with the UN Security Council and Six-Party Talk members to oppose Pyongyang’s “provocative announcement.” In 2005, North Korea walked away from talks with the United States, Japan, China, Russia, and South Korea and has refused to return to the negotiating table because of U.S. financial restrictions, specifically a clampdown on Pyongyang’s alleged counterfeiting activities (NYT).
China and South Korea alerted Pyongyang that a test would hurt relations in the region, but Beijing also made an appeal for all relevant parties to resolve the latest standoff through dialogue. The test statement puts Washington in the position of either making concessions to Kim Jong-Il’s communist regime or taking a firm stand that could trigger an East Asian arms race (IHT). Japan’s new Prime Minister Shinzo Abe warned testing would spark a harsh international response (Australian). Japan is the current president of the UN Security Council, with a special role in convening meetings. The Council in July passed a resolution banning the sale of missile parts to North Korea and demanding the country halt its missile program. A BBC timeline charts the nuclear standoff and breakdown in negotiations to rein in North Korea’s nuclear ambitions.
In an interview with CFR.org's Bernard Gwertzman, CFR Fellow Michael A. Levi says North Korea may be trying to ramp up the threat level after failed missile tests in July, and "a nuclear test is their only real option to step things up a notch." Levi also describes the timing of the test announcement as "unusual," given that it comes within days of the United States saying it will grant North Korea bilateral talks if Pyongyang agrees to return to the multilateral negotiating table (VOA). Washington and Pyongyang need to start talking or run the risk of finding “themselves on a collision course, with Seoul caught in the middle,” says an International Crisis Group report released after North Korea’s long-range missile testing in July. Tong Kim, a visiting professor at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, says confidence building is necessary to defuse the current standoff, but warns the growing distrust between Bush and Kim means improved relations are unlikely as long as Bush is in office (Korea Times). Some experts fault the Bush administration for not engaging in serious diplomacy with Pyongyang but others say North Korea is not a reliable negotiating partner.
Divisions in Bush administration policy on North Korea—one view espousing engagement, the other isolation—have aroused criticism from other members of the multiparty talks, says a Congressional Research Service report (PDF). Analysts David Albright and Paul Brannan of the Institute for Science and International Security estimate North Korea could likely “build a crude nuclear warhead” and has enough plutonium for between four and thirteen nuclear weapons (PDF). The Nuclear Threat Initiative provides a chronology of North Korea’s missile development program and maps of suspected nuclear enrichment sites.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Restoring the Balance: A Middle East Strategy for the Next President, experts from the Council on Foreign Relations and the Saban Center at the Brookings Institution propose a new, nonpartisan Middle East strategy drawing on the lessons of past failures to address both the short-term and long-term challenges to U.S. interests.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
A selection of Foreign Affairs pieces by and about the preeminent political scientist of the last half century.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
Global Economy 
%20and%20South%20Korea%20stand%20guard%20at%20the%20truce%20village%20of%20Panmunjom%20in%20the%20demilitarised%20zone%20separating%20the%20two%20Koreas,%20about%2055%20km%20(31%20miles)%20north%20of%20Seoul,%20September%2013,%202006.%20%20%20REUTERS/You%20Sung-Ho%20(SOUTH%20KOREA)&from=business){kind=link}