home > by publication type > daily analysis > U.S. Surveys Shattered North Korea Policy
Email
| Prepared by: | Michael Moran |
|---|
South Koreans protest the North's nuclear program. (AP/Ahn Young-joon)
North Korea claims it has tested a nuclear weapon (CNN) "with indigenous wisdom and technology 100 percent" results. Details are sketchy but no one appears to be seriously challenging the claim, and seismic recordings from a monitoring station in China are suggestive of a manmade explosion. The test, which analysts say was fairly small (NYT), brings to eight the number of states which have conducted a nuclear blast, and marks a new stage of the Korean peninsula’s own nuclear crisis (FT).
Washington spoke in stark terms about the test's implications. In a press conference yesterday, President Bush said if North Korea tries to transfer nuclear weapons to other states, it would be considered a "grave threat to the United States, and we would hold North Korea fully accountable." But, as CFR Vice President Gary S. Samore notes, Pyongyang is little impressed by American threats. More pivotal are positions in Beijing and Seoul, which also had warned the North against this. The result, says Newsweek, is a diplomatic crisis and new pressure on Beijing, Seoul, and possibly Moscow, to get tougher with the rogue regime.
China issued a scathing denunciation of the tests (Xinhua). Beijing, in particular, may feel a need to stiffen its stance (Times of London). But the test, says Stratfor, an analytical website, may indicate China’s leverage on North Korea (Subscription only) is diminishing. “Beijing likes having North Korea as a dog on a leash, allowing it to bark and throwing it a bone if it barks a bit too much," Stratfor writes. "But this time, the dog has apparently broken its chain.”
The carrots may be withdrawn by Seoul, too. AP reported a scheduled aid shipment—part of the South’s policy of engaging Pyongyang—had been suspended, though no permanent or wider implications are so far implied. But those favoring rapprochement may feel spurned. The Korea Herald, a Seoul-based paper, writes in an op-ed that “North Korea as a nuclear power will find it even more difficult to survive under deepening international isolation leading to [more severe] poverty, and the constant threat of a possible preemptive attack.” South Korea supported a United Nations Security Council resolution passed this summer following North Korea's July 4 missile tests, and the new crisis could help heal ties with Japan, which have been strained by historical grievances. The test coincides with the healing visits of Japan’s tough-talking new leader, Shinzo Abe, to both Beijing and Seoul (Chosen Ilbo). Indeed, Tokyo and Beijing helped drive the UN debate leading to the adoption of a strong warning by the Security Council on Friday (Asahi Shimbun).
Other voices ask, "What it will take to wake up the West?" (National Review Online). Kommersant, a Russian business daily, warns Moscow to “stop protecting problem countries.” Former British Foreign Office Spokesman John Williams, writing in the Guardian's blog, says the time is now for China to prove it is a serious, responsible power. CFR Fellow Michael A. Levi warns in this interview that U.S. military action cannot be ruled out. Diplomacy is the best way to deal with North Korea, writes CFR President Richard N. Haass in Foreign Affairs, but Washington and its partners should agree on a package of economic and political sanctions if North Korea crosses a "red line, such as by testing a nuclear device."
Over the longer term, experts worry about pressure on North Korea’s neighbors to match its new nuclear capabilities. Japan, in particular, has the ability to move in this direction quickly, notes CFR’s Walter Russell Mead. This CATO brief looks at the “inevitable” march of nuclear arms across Asia. And here are issue briefs from the Nuclear Threat Initiative on Japan and South Korea. Writing in Asia Policy, Marcus Noland, a fellow at the Institute for International Economics, examines the possible economic impact of a Pyongyang nuclear test (PDF) on East Asia. North Korea could likely “build a crude nuclear warhead” and has enough plutonium for between four and thirteen nuclear weapons (PDF) say analysts David Albright and Paul Brannan of the Institute for Science and International Security. The Nuclear Threat Initiative provides a chronology of North Korea’s missile development program and maps of suspected nuclear enrichment sites.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.