Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > The AU’s Responsibility to Protect
| Prepared by: |
|---|
African Union honor guard troops stand at attention during an arrival ceremony in Darfur. (AP/Nasser Nasser)
Resistance by the Sudanese government has blocked the implementation of a UN Security Council resolution calling for a UN peacekeeping force in the troubled Darfur region. Khartoum has instead given its blessing for an extension of the smaller mission fielded by the African Union (AU), a young organization without stable funding or fully functioning governing organs. The deployment of the fledgling AU amidst what has been called the world’s worst humanitarian crisis—labeled genocide by Washington—is in the eyes of some an “abject international failure” as well as a measure of the faith others place in the organization.
The aim of the African Union, profiled in this new Backgrounder, is to increase development, combat poverty and corruption, and end Africa’s conflicts. Experts say the AU’s creation of a Peace and Security Council and involvement in peacekeeping operations in Burundi are promising early successes. But it is limited by the very problems it exists to combat. Endemic poverty and civil conflict plague many states in Africa, and when these states see the AU’s struggling to reform its organizational structures, they are less likely to contribute funds. “The AU requires extensive political and material support from the international community to deliver on its commitments,” writes Kristiana Powell, a researcher at The North-South Institute, in a working paper on the AU’s emerging peace and security regime (PDF). A recent CFR Task Force report said African leadership in conflict prevention is important but also acknowledged the great need for international support, such as the logistical aid NATO has provided in Darfur. At a donor conference in July, the United States and European countries pledged roughly $200 million in additional funding to the AU force in Darfur (BBC), but that was before the extension of the AU’s mandate from the end of September until the end of this year. Arab nations raised some $50 million for the force’s extension, but that still falls short of the level of funding the AU will need to operate for the rest of the year.
Peacekeeping experts note three requirements for a successful operation: a defined mandate and peace plan, stable funding and troops, and a commitment to fulfilling the operation’s mandate. The AU force in Darfur lacks all three, due to UN Security Council divisions. In a new CFR.org Podcast, the Brooking Institution’s Roberta Cohen says, “The African Union is being used to create the impression that something is being done to help the people of Darfur.” Meanwhile, the AU is considering another peacekeeping intervention: The Peace and Security Council has endorsed a plan to send 8,000 troops to Somalia, an operation with a projected cost of $931 million.
As the successor to the old Organization for African Unity, which was criticized for its lack of intervention in Rwanda’s genocide and the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s war in the 1990s, the AU seeks a more intrusive role in such circumstances. It is the world’s only regional body that “explicitly recognizes the right to intervene in a member state on humanitarian and human rights grounds,” write Cohen and lawyer William G. O’Neill in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. But this ambitious mandate has its limitations, as shown in Darfur, where the country of intervention has effectively prohibited the peacekeeping force from fulfilling its mandate. Last year, the United Nations General Assembly endorsed the concept of the “responsibility to protect,” but analysts, including CFR Senior Fellow Lee Feinstein, say the UN’s response to Darfur has called into question its commitment to the principle.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
This report outlines the nature of the challenges in Pakistan's tribal areas, formulates strategies for addressing those challenges, and distills the strategies into realistic policy proposals worthy of consideration by the incoming administration.
This report analyzes the debate over U.S. use of assurances against torture, explaining the contexts in which they are used, how they can be conveyed, and what they can contain, and recommends a number of ways to respond to criticism so that the United States can continue using assurances.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
“The Next President:” Richard Holbrooke says the next U.S. president will inherit a more difficult set of international challenges than any predecessor since World War II.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
