home > by publication type > daily analysis > The AU’s Responsibility to Protect
Email
| Prepared by: | Stephanie Hanson |
|---|
African Union honor guard troops stand at attention during an arrival ceremony in Darfur. (AP/Nasser Nasser)
Resistance by the Sudanese government has blocked the implementation of a UN Security Council resolution calling for a UN peacekeeping force in the troubled Darfur region. Khartoum has instead given its blessing for an extension of the smaller mission fielded by the African Union (AU), a young organization without stable funding or fully functioning governing organs. The deployment of the fledgling AU amidst what has been called the world’s worst humanitarian crisis—labeled genocide by Washington—is in the eyes of some an “abject international failure” as well as a measure of the faith others place in the organization.
The aim of the African Union, profiled in this new Backgrounder, is to increase development, combat poverty and corruption, and end Africa’s conflicts. Experts say the AU’s creation of a Peace and Security Council and involvement in peacekeeping operations in Burundi are promising early successes. But it is limited by the very problems it exists to combat. Endemic poverty and civil conflict plague many states in Africa, and when these states see the AU’s struggling to reform its organizational structures, they are less likely to contribute funds. “The AU requires extensive political and material support from the international community to deliver on its commitments,” writes Kristiana Powell, a researcher at The North-South Institute, in a working paper on the AU’s emerging peace and security regime (PDF). A recent CFR Task Force report said African leadership in conflict prevention is important but also acknowledged the great need for international support, such as the logistical aid NATO has provided in Darfur. At a donor conference in July, the United States and European countries pledged roughly $200 million in additional funding to the AU force in Darfur (BBC), but that was before the extension of the AU’s mandate from the end of September until the end of this year. Arab nations raised some $50 million for the force’s extension, but that still falls short of the level of funding the AU will need to operate for the rest of the year.
Peacekeeping experts note three requirements for a successful operation: a defined mandate and peace plan, stable funding and troops, and a commitment to fulfilling the operation’s mandate. The AU force in Darfur lacks all three, due to UN Security Council divisions. In a new CFR.org Podcast, the Brooking Institution’s Roberta Cohen says, “The African Union is being used to create the impression that something is being done to help the people of Darfur.” Meanwhile, the AU is considering another peacekeeping intervention: The Peace and Security Council has endorsed a plan to send 8,000 troops to Somalia, an operation with a projected cost of $931 million.
As the successor to the old Organization for African Unity, which was criticized for its lack of intervention in Rwanda’s genocide and the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s war in the 1990s, the AU seeks a more intrusive role in such circumstances. It is the world’s only regional body that “explicitly recognizes the right to intervene in a member state on humanitarian and human rights grounds,” write Cohen and lawyer William G. O’Neill in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. But this ambitious mandate has its limitations, as shown in Darfur, where the country of intervention has effectively prohibited the peacekeeping force from fulfilling its mandate. Last year, the United Nations General Assembly endorsed the concept of the “responsibility to protect,” but analysts, including CFR Senior Fellow Lee Feinstein, say the UN’s response to Darfur has called into question its commitment to the principle.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.