home > by publication type > daily analysis > North Korea Faces Sanctions
Email
| Prepared by: | Carin Zissis |
|---|
A Chinese paramilitary officer outside the North Korean embassy in Beijing. (AP/Greg Baker)
North Korea’s announcement that it conducted a successful underground nuclear test has set off a scramble to contain the regime’s weapons ambitions and steady global nerves (FT) over the detonation. Concern was such that even Pyongyang’s top ally, sanctions-averse China, believes “there has to be some punitive actions" (Reuters) taken by the UN Security Council. The list of sanctions proposed by the United States would cut off trade (WashPost) in all materials that could be used to make weapons of mass destruction and any financial transactions that could support such a program. The Security Council, though united in condemnation, faces intense negotiations about how tough it should be, even as doubts linger over whether the blast was nuclear (WashTimes).
North Korea may agree to return to multilateral talks now that it's shown its "nuclear hand," Alan D. Romberg, an Asia expert at the Henry L. Stimson Center, told CFR.org's Bernard Gwertzman. Kim Yong Nam, the Stalinist regime's second in command, told Kyodo news agency that future negotiations depended on the response of the United States. His statement came after North Korea's government warned it will carry out more tests if the United States steps up pressure and increased sanctions would be considered "a declaration of war." In its bid to be considered a major world power, the communist nation continues to seek (Sydney Morning Herald) bilateral talks with the United States. Washington’s refusal to meet one-on-one with Pyongyang has left North Koreans feeling "frustrated and aggrieved, "(Strategic Insights) (PDF) says the Center for Nonproliferation Studies’ Daniel A. Pinkston.
Pyongyang's test coincided with diplomatic talks in Northeast Asia, where Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and South Korean President Roh Moo Hyun met in Seoul within hours of the underground explosion and agreed it warranted a stern response (Japan Times). South Korea will not agree to a UN Security Council resolution that includes military force (Korea Times), but OhMyNews, a South Korean blog, warns the “first victim” of the nuclear test will be South Korea’s “sunshine policy,” adopted in the late 1990s to warm relations with the North. Kim Dae-Jung, former president and the policy's founder, blamed harsh U.S. treatment (Korea Times) of North Korea for the current crisis.
Perhaps the gravest fear caused by the test is that North Korea will sell its weapons technology (NYT). The efficacy of U.S. sanctions to control Pyongyang's nuclear sales depends on China and Russia monitoring of their air and land space for arms shipments, reports the Los Angeles Times. The position of China, one of Pyongyang’s main donors, is of pivotal importance, says CFR Vice President Gary S. Samore. China voiced its annoyance with the tests (People’s Daily), but it’s unclear how far it will go. Peter Hayes and Tim Savage of the Nautilus Institute say Beijing—along with Seoul and Moscow—knows that bringing down the Kim Jong-Il regime with financial punishment could result in nuclear weapons falling into the wrong hands. “Right now, the best response is to do little and say nothing, in order to devalue Kim's bomb,” they write. Although the nuclear test sparked worries (Economist) of a nuclear arms race in Northeast Asia, Japan’s Abe, regarded as a hard-liner on North Korea, promised that Japan will not attempt to develop nuclear weapons (Australian). But the American Enterprise Institute’s David Frum says Japan should do just that. “It's time to put an end to the silly pretense that today's democratic Japan owes a burden of guilt to today's rising China,” he writes in the New York Times. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s George Perkovich called for cool heads to avoid nuclear proliferation in the region and “knee-jerk” reactions from the U.S. Congress.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.