home > by publication type > daily analysis > Questions Linger After Sanctions
Email
| Prepared by: | Carin Zissis |
|---|
A North Korean ship is stopped by Chinese border patrol. (AP)
The UN Security Council passed a unanimous resolution imposing sanctions against North Korea for its October 9 nuclear test, but the document's vague wording raises questions on how it will be enforced. It remains unclear, for example, whether economic activity between North Korea and its main trading partners—namely China and South Korea—would be affected (LAT). Both countries indicated their intention to continue cross-border trade and carry out a number of economic projects already in the works (NYT). Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice travels to the region this week in an effort to press these countries to carry out the sanctions regime (CSMonitor).
Over the past week of intense diplomatic negotiations, UN Security Council members struggled to find consensus on how harshly the regime should be disciplined for the test, which the United States has confirmed was nuclear. The differences (BBC) among main Security Council and regional actors reflect long-standing preferences by some states to coax, rather than punish, poorly behaving regimes. Before the approval of the UN resolution, Japan had already passed strong unilateral sanctions (Mainichi) banning North Korean ships in its waters, imports, and citizens. In spite of taking a hardline approach to the Hermit Kingdom, the nuclear crisis has given Shinzo Abe, Japan’s new prime minister, common ground to mend relations with China and South Korea, as this new Backgrounder explains.
R. Nicholas Burns, Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs, says the North Korea crisis presents an opportunity for Washington to strengthen its strategic position in Asia. Yan Xuetong, a Chinese security expert, tells Der Spiegel “America committed a grave mistake” that caused the current problem when it imposed sanctions last year excluding North Korea from participating in international banking. Peter Hayes and Tim Savage of the Nautilus Institute say Beijing—along with Seoul and Moscow—knows that bringing down the regime with financial punishment could result in nuclear weapons falling into the wrong hands. But Beijing signaled it would go along with the UN agreement when it began inspecting cargo trucks (Reuters) Monday along its border with North Korea.
Ross Terrill of Harvard’s East Asia Center says the UN resolution won’t resolve the problem, and that “less perilous for nearly everyone than either war or diplomatic Band-Aids are steps toward Korean reunification.” (Australian). The “only way to disarm the regime is to destroy it,” Charles Krauthammer writes in the Washington Post, but says this won’t come to pass because the United States will not go to war with North Korea. Sanctions and military action have emerged as options to confront the threat, and an essay published by the American Society of International Law looks at the legality of aggressive responses to Weapons of Mass Destruction. Recent sanctions placed on North Korea by Japan and Australia are summarized by Arms Control Today.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
This report outlines the nature of the challenges in Pakistan's tribal areas, formulates strategies for addressing those challenges, and distills the strategies into realistic policy proposals worthy of consideration by the incoming administration.
This report analyzes the debate over U.S. use of assurances against torture, explaining the contexts in which they are used, how they can be conveyed, and what they can contain, and recommends a number of ways to respond to criticism so that the United States can continue using assurances.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
“The Next President:” Richard Holbrooke says the next U.S. president will inherit a more difficult set of international challenges than any predecessor since World War II.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
