Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > op-eds > Make Africa no-nuke zone
| Authors: | Charles D. Ferguson, Philip D. Reed Senior Fellow for Science and Technology Lisa Obrentz |
|---|
October 17, 2006
Baltimore Sun
North Korea apparently has tested a nuclear weapon. Iran is moving ahead with its nuclear program. Given this bad news, it would seem that soon, every country that wants nukes will get them. But the good news is that dozens of countries in the developing world have renounced nuclear arms by forming nuclear-weapon-free zones.
During Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev’s visit last month to the United States, President Bush praised Kazakhstan for renouncing nuclear arms. On Sept. 8, Kazakhstan joined other Central Asian nations to create the world's newest nuclear-weapon-free zone. Latin America, the Caribbean, the South Pacific and Southeast Asia have formed these zones, which go beyond the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty by, for example, banning all nuclear tests within the zones.
Africa is next in line. Ten years ago, most of Africa’s 53 countries signed the Treaty of Pelindaba to create a nuclear-weapon-free zone. But to enter into force, the treaty needs 28 countries to ratify it. To date, eight more ratifications are required. With problems such as crushing poverty, public health crises and armed conflict, it is no surprise that many African countries have delayed ratification. Still, they have made a stride in the right direction.
By creating a nuclear-weapon-free zone, African nations would benefit in four fundamental ways: preventing nuclear threats from countries, guarding against radiological and nuclear terrorism, protecting the environment, and promoting economic development. Let us consider these benefits in order:
The nuclear energy commission could also investigate shady acquisitions of uranium resources. For example, in the lead-up to the Iraq war, the Bush administration charged that Saddam Hussein was attempting to acquire uranium from Niger. But on further investigation, that claim proved false. In the future, with an African nuclear-weapon-free zone, the commission could become a credible investigator of such allegations.
With an African nuclear-weapon-free zone, the entire Southern Hemisphere would become a nuclear-weapon-free club. Perhaps more important, creating an African zone would put more pressure on the Middle East to prevent the proliferation of nuclear arms.
Egypt, as part of both Africa and the Middle East, could serve as a linchpin. It has long supported a Middle Eastern WMD-free zone, which would ban nuclear as well as chemical and biological weapons. An exclusively nuclear-weapon-free zone singles out Israel’s nuclear arsenal but would not address fears of chemical weapons stockpiled in Iran and Syria, for instance.
On Sept. 24, Egypt revived the moribund Supreme Council for Energy to look closely at building commercial nuclear reactors. Many analysts have interpreted this move as a means of hedging against a future nuclear-armed Iran. This potential development provides another reason for Africa-wide consultation and coordination on nuclear power.
The idea of creating nuclear-weapon-free zones was born in Africa in the early 1960s. During the 1970s and 1980s, South Africa built six nuclear bombs. In 1989, South African President F. W. de Klerk helped halt an outbreak of arms races by ordering the dismantling of his country’s nuclear arsenal. South Africa remains the only country to have entirely dismantled its nuclear stockpile.
To stop future nuclear arms races, African countries should move quickly to strengthen disarmament and global security by enacting a nuclear-weapon-free zone.
This article appears in full on CFR.org by permission of its original publisher. It was originally available here
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
