home > by publication type > daily analysis > Taking the Slow Track on Trade
Email
| Prepared by: | Lee Hudson Teslik |
|---|
Farm subsidies are a sticking point in trade negotiations. (AP)
If Democrats take back both houses of Congress in November, one of the first legislative casualties could be President Bush’s power to negotiate free trade agreements without congressional review. That power, known as fast track trade promotion authority, was granted to Bush in 2002 amid bitter congressional debate and expires in July 2007. Under a Democratic Congress it seems unlikely to be renewed; asked if a Democratic-controlled legislature would extend Bush’s fast track authority, former Democratic Congressman Tom Downey told the Washington Post, “There's not a chance in hell.”
Beyond simply denting the president’s power, the evaporation of trade-promotion authority could sound a death knell for the sweeping global trade reforms targeted by the World Trade Organization in 2001 in Doha, Qatar. After five years of false starts, negotiations in Doha were suspended indefinitely this past July. Experts say the U.S. delegation was partly to blame for the breakdown, for resisting a deal that would have set a strict limit on its agricultural subsidies. In an interview with CFR.org, Richard T. Crowder, the chief agricultural negotiator for the U.S. Trade Representative, said EU member states and countries in the developing world needed to improve access to their agricultural markets for the United States to extend a more generous proposal. But Rep. Jim Kolbe (R-AZ) lambasted the American tendency to cling to farm subsidies in a Washington Post op-ed: “It makes zero sense to wipe out the benefits of U.S. foreign assistance in order to keep paying our farmers to be inefficient.”
The president’s fast track authority is seen as an important tool in the effort to push through a meaningful Doha agreement, as this Business Roundtable briefing explains. Without it, any proposal agreed to at Doha would have to be approved by Congress—always a tall order given America’s divided legislature. Now, with the sands of American politics shifting and the new Congress almost certain to be more protectionist than the current one (even if the Democrats don’t regain control), the overwhelming sentiment is that Doha’s window of opportunity may have come and gone. “At best it looks likely to be years before the sun rises again on the WTO talks,” according to the Economist .
With broader global talks mothballed, the United States seems set on a new tack—bilateral free trade agreements, particularly in strategically important areas like the Middle East, Pacific Rim, and Latin America. This Backgrounder outlines these efforts, and discusses their broader implications on the Doha negotiations. There is heated debate, however, on the best course forward. A CFR Critical Policy Choice outlines trade policy options, and questions whether lowering trade barriers is the only prudent option. But another report, the 2006 Index of Economic Freedom, which was co-produced by the Heritage Foundation and Wall Street Journal, argues countries that are friendly to free trade have higher per-capita growth than protectionist nations.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.