home > by publication type > daily analysis > China Plays Its North Korea Hand
Email
| Prepared by: | Michael Moran |
|---|
North Korea is watching China's reaction to its nuclear tests very carefully. (AP/Lee Jin-man)
Ever protective of North Korea’s sovereignty, China chose not to overplay the alarm, or any of the anger it may have felt about North Korea’s nuclear test earlier this month. Yet three weeks after Pyongyang’s nuclear detonation, with U.S.-led efforts to enforce new United Nations sanctions drawing lukewarm pledges in the region, China’s behind-the-scenes arm twisting apparently convinced North Korea to ratchet down the defiance a notch.
Tuesday’s announcement by China’s foreign ministry of a resumption of Six-Party Talks on North Korean nuclear weapons hardly counts as a breakthrough given the fruitless trajectory of the multiple rounds of talks which came before. Gary Samore, a North Korea nuclear expert who participated in negotations with North Korea during the Clinton administration, says he is "very skeptical the talks will make any progress." Yet U.S., Japanese, Australian, and other regional governments fearful of a North Korean regime immune to outside pressure may take heart that China finally made use of its unique leverage over Kim Jong-Il’s regime. CFR.org’s Carin Zissis looks at China’s economic ties with the North in this Backgrounder.
Economic pressure on North Korea, which conducted its nuclear test October 9, likely played a role in getting Kim to return to the table. Monthly statistics released by China’s Ministry of Commerce show a sharp, unprecedented drop in oil deliveries to Pyongyang in September (NYT), as concerns about a possible test heightened. Publicly, China says its trade with the North remains normal (AP) and reports suggest many other goods continue to flow (Globe&Mail). Adam Segal, CFR Senior Fellow for China Studies, notes in an interview with CFR.org’s Bernard Gwertzman that Pyongyang previously had set conditions on its return to talks, claiming a U.S. crackdown on suspected North Korean black market currency dealings had broken previous agreements. Whether concessions from Washington also were involved remains unclear.
From China's standpoint, the return of the North to negotiations will be viewed as a victory. The White House, too, welcomed the news (Reuters), and Christopher Hill, Washington’s chief North Korea negotiator, says the United States hopes a new round of talks will be held before the end of 2006 (Reuters). But others are less sanguine. Japan had tried hard to ensure the North would not be allowed back into talks as an openly nuclear nation (Japan Times), having agreed to renounce nuclear weapons in 2005. Japan remains the nation most acutely disturbed by the nuclear test, and the ruling Liberal Democratic Party’s policy chief, Shoichi Nakagawa, made the point during a visit to Washington this week by calling for a national debate on the creation of a Japanese nuclear deterrent (Asahi Shimbun). North Korea’s test sparked concerns about a kind of nuclear domino effect in Northeast Asia.
Where would a new round take the nuclear talks? A former U.S.-North Korea negotiator, Kenneth Quinones, suggested Bush might bow to domestic political pressure and agree to direct talks with Pyongyang (Bloomberg). Washington has said such talks are possible within the Six-Party framework, but not outside of it. Meanwhile, Washington will continue to press for more vigorous uptake on UN sanctions, and for South Korea to fully join the Proliferation Security Initiative, a program aimed at preventing the export of North Korea's nuclear and ballistic technology.
But deep divisions remain between the U.S. and Japan, on one hand, and South Korea, whose government continues to defend economic and political engagement with North Korea. Joint ventures—a tourist resort and a light industrial project—bring much needed hard currency into North Korea. South Korean opposition figures contend this money helped fund Pyongyang’s nuclear program, and polling shows the popularity of South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun to be at least one sure casualty of the nuclear test (Economist). Ties between Washington and Seoul remain fragile.
But China’s actions merit most attention. Susan Shirk, an Asian affairs specialist at the University of California, says “the North Korean nuclear test, by driving China to become part of the solution and averting conflict between China and Japan, shifted strategic ground in Northeast Asia” (YaleGlobal). More than ever, agrees CFR Vice President Gary Samore, China is in the driver’s seat.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.