home > by publication type > daily analysis > Inaction Breeds Death in Darfur
Email
| Prepared by: | Michael Moran |
|---|
A young girl in a Darfur refugee camp is one of some two million displaced persons struggling to survive. (AP/Alfred De Montesquiou)
When Kurds took de facto control of northern Iraq after the 1991 Gulf War, among the discoveries made were the taped remarks of Ali Hassan al-Majid, aka “Chemical Ali,” just before he ordered the gassing of rebellious locals. “I will kill them all with chemical weapons!” al-Majid railed. “Who is going to say anything? The international community? F*** them.” As columnist Nick Cohen notes in The Observer, recent events in Sudan suggest such disdain for international law may be as valid as ever.
In spite of UN Security Council decisions to deploy peacekeepers to Sudan’s Darfur region, in spite of a U.S. government finding that “genocide” is taking place there, and President Bush’s call at the UN General Assembly in September for immediate action, not much has changed. As CFR’s chief Africa expert Princeton Lyman notes: “We always thought that if something was finally designated as genocide it would trigger the Genocide Convention and the international community would have to act,” he told CFR.org’s Bernard Gwertzman. “What we’re finding is that in itself doesn’t define what has to be done or what can be done.”
The Darfur conflict (BBC), which pits Sudan’s Islamic government and its agents, the Arab janjaweed militias, against rebellious groups in Darfur seeking greater rights over their local resources, affects civilians most severely. Establishing an exact death toll may be impossible in such a region, but UN and other reliable estimates range from 150,000 to 200,000 dead, with some two million displaced over the past three years. Human rights groups agree both sides commit atrocities. However, successive reports by Human Rights Watch, the International Crisis Group (ICG), and the UN’s High Commissioner for Human Rights (PDF) chronicle systematic abuses by Sudan’s military and allied militias. The ICG report, dated last month, also blames “the international community’s three-year failure to apply effective diplomatic and economic pressure on Sudan’s government and its senior officials.”
The Security Council finally agreed to send peacekeeping troops to reinforce and replace a weaker African Union mission in the region. But Sudan’s government refuses to allow the UN to deploy, invoking timeworn concerns about “Western imperialism” and Zionism (WashPost), winning Khartoum support from the Arab League (BBC) as well as nations at odds with Washington. Late last month, Sudan expelled the UN’s envoy, Jan Pronk, whom it accused of showing bias in remarks posted on his personal weblog (BBC). The stalemate led CFR Senior Fellow Max Boot to propose a mercenary force for Darfur (LAT).
So far unwilling to invoke articles of the UN Charter that would allow the Security Council to intervene in spite of Khartoum’s objections, the world body instead mulled plans this week to site a monitoring force in neighboring Chad, where refugees and fighting has spilled over (AlertNet). Tensions between the two states rose over the weekend with an accusation of Sudanese air force bombardments in Chad (VOA), and clashes between Chadian military units and Darfur rebels that allegedly killed one of the army’s top commanders (AP). The rebels have taken increasing criticism since their decision to eschew a peace accord signed last April. Efforts to revive talks continue without concrete progress to date (VOA). Says CFR’s Lyman: “The rebel groups are no great shakes. They’ve committed humanitarian degradations. They’ve attacked food convoys. And sometimes their conflicts for power have interfered with the peace process.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.