home > by publication type > daily analysis > Questions Surround Pakistan Strike
Email
| Prepared by: | Eben Kaplan |
|---|
The bodies of alleged militants killed in an air strike are prepared for a mass burial. (AP)
In January of this year, Pakistanis took to the streets to protest the deaths of eighteen civilians in a U.S. air strike on a village near Pakistan’s border with Afghanistan. This week Pakistanis angrily rallied again when eighty people died in an attack (BBC) on a madrassa that Pakistani leaders claim served as an al-Qaeda training camp. Pakistani officials say they gathered intelligence and carried out the attacks without U.S. help and that only terrorists were targeted in the attack. “Anyone who is saying that these were innocent Taliban is telling lies,” President Pervez Musharraf said, “They were all militants, using weapons, doing military training” (NYT).
Still, questions remain about what transpired last Monday at the madrassa. Despite Islamabad’s insistence that the operation only employed Pakistani military helicopters, some locals claim they saw an unmanned U.S. Predator drone fire at the religious school. The Counterterrorism Blog, an online forum of terrorism experts, cites a military intelligence source who confirms a Predator worked in concert with helicopters to launch the attack. Human Rights Watch labeled the strike “excessive” and called for an independent investigation.
Another question is whether the attack targeted any senior terrorist leaders. The January air strike missed its target, identified by U.S. officials as al-Qaeda deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri, by a matter of hours. A Pakistani security spokesman said the latest attack targeted Zawahiri, along with Abu Ubaidah al-Masri—a man Pakistani officials link to the plot to down transatlantic airliners with liquid bombs this summer—though neither man was present (Times of London) when the helicopters opened fire. But a different government spokesman denied Zawahiri was the target (Bloomberg). Decapitations of an organization’s leadership, known as targeted killings, play an increasing role in U.S. counterterrorism efforts, though it’s not clear whether Pakistani officials have increased use of this method. U.S. terrorism expert Daniel Byman questioned the strategy’s effectiveness in a recent Foreign Affairs article.
President Musharraf finds himself sandwiched between domestic pressure to resist Western influence and international pressure to pursue terrorists on his territory. This, he told a recent CFR audience, makes his the most difficult job in the world. Though a partner in the “war on terror,” Musharraf’s critics—including Afghan President Hamid Karzai, and numerous NATO commanders—accuse him of turning a blind eye to the resurgent Taliban. Others rail against his alliance with the United States (Dawn). Intelligence analysts condemned a September peace agreement with tribal leaders in the North Waziristan as surrender to the terrorists. Pakistan may soon reach a similar agreement (NBC) with leaders in the Bajur tribal district, where the bombed-out madrassa was.
Meanwhile, Indian and British officials have accused Pakistan’s intelligence agency, the ISI, of aiding terrorists who operate in India, Afghanistan, and elsewhere. Last month on Meet the Press, Musharraf conceded that retired ISI officers might be aiding the Taliban. Steve Coll, a journalist who has written extensively about the region, discusses ISI’s Taliban ties with Frontline.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.