home > by publication type > daily analysis > Voters Rebuff Bush on Iraq
Email
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Likely next Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi celebrates with fellow Democrats. (AP/Gerald Herbert)
Broad disapproval of the Iraq war helped Democrats gain the majority of the House of Representatives for the first time since 1994 (LAT) and a razor-thin win in the Senate gave them complete control of Congress (WashPost). The likely next Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), called the results a mandate for change on policy in Iraq. While Democrats will have the power to call investigations in Congress, they are not expected to curtail the military’s spending needs for Iraq in the short run, writes William M. Arkin, a blogger for the Washington Post. One immediate response to the elections, however, was the resignation of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld (NYT), sought by leading Democrats who accused him of bungling the postwar planning in Iraq. The Bush administration is likely to face unaccustomed congressional pressure for a redeployment of forces but foreign policymaking still rests firmly with the administration. The Christian Science Monitor looks at the prospects for Bush administration shifts on Iraq policy in the new domestic political landscape.
President George W. Bush says he will work for bipartisan cooperation but added if the Democrats call “to get out now, regardless,” it’s going to be hard to work together. Meanwhile, the administration has assured Iraqis that Democrats and Republicans will work together to help “the mission in Iraq succeed” (McClatchy). Bush says his administration will closely study the forthcoming recommendations of the bipartisan Baker-Hamilton commission on Iraq. Members of both parties seem to be putting a lot of stock in the commission's views, but at the end of the day it is Bush's call on troop deployment, James M. Lindsay, an expert on Congress and CFR's former director of studies, tells CFR.org's Bernard Gwertzman.
Some of the senior House Democrats in line to assume chairmanships, outlined in this Backgrounder, have signaled they will explore oversight hearings into matters like military procurement contracts and reconstruction issues in Iraq. Rep. Ike Skelton (D-MO), who would chair the House Armed Services Committee, has mentioned reestablishing that body’s oversight and investigations subcommittee, disbanded by Republicans in 1995 (Bloomberg).
Beyond Iraq, two foreign policy issues where congressional Democrats could have immediate impact are trade and immigration. Congress could face a series of major trade decisions (AP) even before the current session expires, including approval of a free trade agreement with Peru and a bilateral agreement with Vietnam. Democrats have been increasingly skeptical of such agreements, believing they are tapping into public mistrust of the fallout from trade deals (MarketWatch). Republicans are still hopeful Congress will extend President Bush’s trade-promotion authority, set to expire next summer, because it is crucial for the survival of the multilateral Doha trade round.
The story may be different on immigration. House Republicans have strongly opposed the comprehensive reform bill backed by Bush and the Senate, which creates a path to citizenship for most of the country’s estimated 12 million illegal immigrants. Democrats in the House are more supportive of comprehensive steps and a strong showing of support among Hispanic voters (ABC) appeared to indicate a backlash against House Republicans’ enforcement-only approach to illegal immigration. The Manhattan Institute’s Tamar Jacoby says the country is far less divided on the issue than congressional debate has suggested and writes in Foreign Affairs that the next Congress must come up with legislation to repair the nation’s immigration system.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.