home > by publication type > backgrounder > India’s Energy Crunch
Email
| Author: | Carin Zissis |
|---|
Updated: October 23, 2007
India’s gross domestic product (GDP) growth hit 9.2 percent for the period from July through September of this year—an increase over the already robust rate of 8.4 percent during the same period last year. But along with an ascendant economy comes a mounting hunger for energy, and New Delhi fears it cannot sustain growth in the long term without continually boosting the country’s energy supply. India’s per capita energy consumption rates remain low in comparison to those of countries like the United States and China. But India, the world’s fifth biggest energy consumer, is projected to surpass Japan and Russia to take third place by 2030. Doing so will test India’s ability to create a domestic policy for its semi-privatized energy sector, as well as its capacity to develop relationships with foreign energy exporters.
The country faces “formidable challenges” (PDF) in meeting its energy needs, according to India’s Planning Commission. The government hopes to maintain an annual GDP growth rate of about 8 percent over the next quarter century to meet its goals for poverty eradication. That level of growth will require India to at least triple its primary energy supply and quintuple its electrical capacity. This will force India, which already imports a majority of its oil, to look beyond its borders for energy resources. “There’s a tremendous amount of concern” that the gap between the energy demand and supply will slow down the economy, says researcher Tanvi Madan, author of a recent Brookings Institution report on Indian energy issues.
Furthermore, India’s energy sector is plagued by sporadic nationalization efforts. During the 1990s, India began liberalizing its economy, allowing for privatization of some sectors historically under state control. But, of India’s various industries, the energy sector remains most firmly in the hands of the state, says Pramit Pal Chauduri, an Asia Society fellow and foreign editor of the Hindustan Times. Chauduri says the real need for reform “lies not within what we do overseas, but the need to liberalize our markets internally.”
Experts say lack of coordination among competing government ministries has slowed the effort to institute effective energy policies. “India has yet to develop a coherent policy,” says Ganguly, who adds that the four main energy ministries act like “different countries at work.” India did have a central energy ministry until 1992, which was then broken down into the ministries of Coal, Petroleum and Natural Gas, Nonconventional Energy Sources, and of Power. Several other government agencies, including the Planning Commission and Department of Atomic Energy, play a role in energy policy. Madan says there are common policy goals, but the lack of integration causes problems with implementation.
India’s tradition of state-dominated, centralized planning slows progress in the energy sector. Privatization efforts have been “entirely piecemeal” and “investors are jittery,” says Sumit Ganguly, the India studies chair at Indiana University, Bloomington. Private firms waver over investments when they see preferential treatment for state-owned companies. For example, the production of coal, India’s most highly-consumed energy source, remains largely in state control, with 90 percent of production accounted for by the mines of state-run Coal India.
The national government also subsidizes energy prices, at times limiting profitability for both private and state investors. Experts say the government would probably prefer to set energy prices at market rates, but doing so results in risking a vote loss in elections. Chaudhuri says governments introduce the idea, “but then an election comes and they say ‘no, no, no, subsidize.’”
The primary challenges facing India’s energy sectors are:
In July 2005, President Bush and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh reached an agreement to provide India with assistance for its civilian nuclear energy program. New Delhi has pledged to allow inspections and safeguards of its nuclear facilities. Proponents say the deal could help India meet its energy needs over the medium to long term by opening the door to investment in the country’s nuclear energy sector. Before taking effect, the agreement requires approval by U.S. and Indian legislative bodies as well as the international Nuclear Suppliers Group, which oversees guidelines for sale of the nuclear materials. Chaudhuri says an important element of the deal involves a “clean coal agreement” to help counteract the environmental hazards of burning India’s low-quality coal, as well as to improve the coal industry.
But critics of the deal say it will hurt international nonproliferation efforts because India, which has tested nuclear weapons, is not a member of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). The U.S.-India deal only safeguards civilian nuclear facilities made by India when the deal was reached and it does not limit the number of nuclear weapons India produces.
The nuclear deal has also faced opposition from the left-wing bloc in India’s parliament, comprised primarily of the Communist parties who form part of the ruling coalition. They contend that the deal compromises Indian sovereignty. The coalition government headed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh depends on the support of the left parties to remain in power.
India’s decision to forge energy partnerships with countries such as Syria, Sudan, Myanmar, and, particularly, Iran has also raised concerns in the United States. India signed a $150 million gas exploration deal with Myanmar in September 2007 when Myanmar’s ruling junta was facing international sanctions for cracking down on pro-democracy activists. The United States and the United Nations have repeatedly urged India to use its influence with Myanmar’s government to usher in reform.
Despite U.S. concerns over India’s energy dealings with Iran, this year India supported the United States in an International Atomic Energy Agency vote that referred the matter of Iran’s nuclear program to the UN Security Council. At the same time, the presence of some 150 million Muslims in India raises concerns over stirring trouble in relations with Iran. Also, says Ganguly, India’s desperate need for energy means if Iranians will supply petroleum “we’re going to sup with them.” However, a 2005 deal between Iran and India proposing a natural gas pipeline has so far come to naught because of political difficulties with securing the project in Pakistan as well as the unreliability of agreements with the Iranian government, says Chaudhuri.
As one solution to the energy crunch it’s facing, India has sought to diversify the number of source countries for energy and sought deals in Central Asia, Africa, and Latin America. New Delhi finds itself competing with the other power-hungry Asian giant, China. Beijing frequently outbids New Delhi or “sweetens the deal” with other projects, explains Madan. She also says India is new to learning how to negotiate deals. “India came to this game later. It doesn’t have the kind of resources China does.”
Earlier this year, Shankar Aiyar, India’s former petroleum and natural gas minister, signed an agreement with China aimed at advancing energy cooperation (China Daily).The two countries have worked together in Sudan and Syria. But experts say the China-India pact has had little effect on the two countries’ competition for oil, particularly since pro-China Aiyar has since been replaced by a more market friendly minister.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
This report outlines the nature of the challenges in Pakistan's tribal areas, formulates strategies for addressing those challenges, and distills the strategies into realistic policy proposals worthy of consideration by the incoming administration.
This report analyzes the debate over U.S. use of assurances against torture, explaining the contexts in which they are used, how they can be conveyed, and what they can contain, and recommends a number of ways to respond to criticism so that the United States can continue using assurances.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
“The Right Way to Engage China:” Henry M. Paulson argues that the prosperity of the United States and China depends on helping China to further integrate into the global economic system.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
