home > by publication type > daily analysis > Feeding India’s Energy Fix
Email
| Prepared by: | Carin Zissis |
|---|
Faced with energy shortages, India is hoping to boost its nuclear energy sector (AP/Rafiq Maqbool)
The U.S. Congress has reached agreement on a bill approving a landmark deal allowing the United States to provide New Delhi with fuel and technology to expand its civilian nuclear energy program (AP). In July, President Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh announced a framework for the pact, which lifts a three-decade U.S. moratorium on nuclear trade with India in exchange for its acceptance on safeguards on its civilian nuclear facilities. While both houses of Congress negotiated a compromise bill, Undersecretary of State Nicholas R. Burns headed to New Delhi to reassure India’s government (Times of India) about the U.S. version of the agreement. The deal still requires approval by India’s parliament. More difficult to secure is the necessary support of the Nuclear Suppliers Group, which oversees guidelines for sale of the nuclear materials (Asia Times).
New Delhi hopes the deal will help boost its nuclear energy sector. As this new Backgrounder on India’s troubled energy sector explains, the boom in India’s economy coincides with a rising demand for fuels in what is already the world’s fifth-largest energy consumer. Although India ranks relatively low in terms of per capita energy consumption, to sustain its high gross domestic product growth rate—which hit 9.2 percent between July and September this year—the country needs to dramatically increase (PDF) its energy supply, according to India’s Planning Commission. A new report by the Brookings Institution takes a look at India’s growing energy hunger, focusing in particular on oil demands, with the country importing 65 percent of its petroleum supply. India also relies heavily on its own low-quality coal reserves, raising environmental concerns. Testifying to the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources in July, CFR Adjunct Fellow David G. Victor said, “The nuclear deal probably will lead India to emit substantially less” carbon dioxide.
While supporters of the deal say it provides needed energy opportunities for India and investment possibilities for the United States, critics warn the pact seriously harms the international nonproliferation regime. India, which joined the “nuclear club” when it first conducted a test in 1974, never signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). As Fred Kaplan wrote in Slate, “India would receive the same rewards as countries that had signed the NPT—without actually having to sign it and thus to put up with its restraints.” Meanwhile, a CFR Special Report on the nuclear deal says India’s “attempts to dilute even its limited commitments” have caused concern that the country will try to bargain for a weak nuclear facility inspection agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Henry Sokolski, executive director of the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center, writes in the Weekly Standard the Indian government’s reluctance amounts to a “tipping of the nuclear rules meant to render them all but worthless in India's case.”
But proponents of the deal say India has a long history of good faith when it comes to nonproliferation, including self-imposing safeguards on its nuclear program. In a CFR Online Debate with Sokolski, Teresita Schaeffer, director of the South Asia program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, says India “has consistently protected its military [nuclear] program.” She also points out that India joined the United States in an IAEA board vote against Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.