Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > In Africa, Aid or Air Strikes?
| Prepared by: |
|---|
A U.S. task force in the Horn of Africa coordinates both aid delivery and military action, such as the recent air strikes in Somalia. (AP/Sayyid Azim)
Celebrities including Bono, Angelina Jolie, George Clooney, and Oprah Winfrey all made headlines this year for their philanthropic efforts in Africa. Yet the accomplishments of a far more powerful figure—President Bush—seem to have largely escaped the media’s attention. The president has tripled development and humanitarian aid to Africa to more than $4 billion (WashPost) since taking office. This increase in aid includes a $15-billion, five-year global health initiative, the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), and a $1.2-billion malaria initiative. While some criticize the president for not doing more to halt the genocide in Darfur, he played a role in ending Liberia’s civil war and proved instrumental in bringing about a peace deal in southern Sudan in 2005.
U.S. policy in Africa seeks to promote democracy, expand economic opportunity, fight disease, and end war on the continent, said Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Jendayi Frazer in a May speech. Unlike U.S. policy in Iraq or Afghanistan, the Bush administration’s approach toward Africa has been dominated by combating poverty and ending humanitarian crises. But this week’s air strikes in Somalia, targeting senior al-Qaeda members, may signal a U.S. policy shift that favors counterterror initiatives and military involvement over aid. This perception—whether true or not—has already damaged U.S. standing in Somalia, where news of the attacks set off fresh waves of anti-American sentiment in Mogadishu.
Though Africa has never been a priority for the Pentagon, that looks set to change. At the urging of former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, President Bush is expected to announce the creation of a new African Command (CSMonitor) early this year. The United States currently has a Horn of Africa joint task force in Djibouti. Established after the 9/11 attacks, it includes some 1,500 troops. Responsibility for the rest of the continent is divided among three of the Pentagon’s five regional commands. Experts say consolidating oversight of the continent confirms its growing strategic importance to the United States. But “it is vulnerable to mischaracterization (CSMonitor) as a modern-day ‘scramble for Africa’ by the most powerful military in the world,” writes Rep. Ed Royce (R-CA), former chair of the House Subcommittee on Africa.
The possible policy shift comes at a time of waning American influence in the region. The rise of Chinese investment in the continent, the booming oil wealth of many African countries, and U.S. involvement in Iraq all have diluted the results of U.S. policy, experts say. “The actual ability of the United States to influence circumstances on the ground in Africa has declined dramatically (NYT),” says Michael Clough, former director of CFR’s Africa program.
At the same time, Africa is of growing strategic importance to the United States, not least of all because of its substantial oil resources. The Heritage Foundation’s Brett D. Schaefer writes that Africa’s importance as a U.S. energy source will only grow in the coming years. A CFR Independent Task Force on Africa recognizes Africa’s growing strategic importance and urges a dynamic U.S. policy that unites its currently fragmented initiatives on counterterrorism, HIV/AIDS, and economic development.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
