Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > An Iraq Plan Unfolds
| Prepared by: | Lionel Beehner |
|---|
Previous U.S. efforts to secure Baghdad have faltered. (AP/Samir Mizban)
The debate over Iraq hinges on this dilemma: Without security, there can be no political solution, but without a political solution there can be no security. President Bush is now emphasizing security, having spent three years and over $300 billion on trying to forge political reconciliation in Iraq to little avail. He has ordered twenty-one thousand additional troops to secure the most battle-worn parts of Baghdad, as this new Backgrounder explains, and Anbar province in a last-ditch military effort to rescue the country—and perhaps the region—from catastrophe.
There are some promising signs his surge plan might work. CFR President Richard N. Haass, who on the whole is skeptical of the surge plan, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee it may “provide time and space” to allow the Iraqi government to beef up its military and police forces and make progress on unresolved issues like revenue sharing. It may also help shift the onus for failure from the Americans and onto the Iraqis in charge.
Similar counterinsurgency efforts to “clear, hold, and build” have reduced violence and enhanced stability in places like Tal Afar (New Yorker) and Mosul. It is risky, top military officials admit, but not undoable.
Of course, doubts remain if Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s government can deliver on his promises. A similar surge of forces into Baghdad last summer was undermined by the Iraqis’ inability and unwillingness to “hold” areas once they were “cleared” by the Americans. Maliki has previously thwarted U.S. efforts to arrest Shiite militia leaders, though massive arrests last week, including the capture of a top aide to the notorious cleric Muqtada al-Sadr (CNN), could suggest a change. “The truth is, we’ve pressured Maliki to do things which he may not be able to do and may not want to do,” Anthony H. Cordesman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies tells CFR.org's Bernard Gwertzman. William M. Arkin, a former Army intelligence analyst, is also skeptical (WashPost). “Iraq is all about ideology, about allegiances and power struggles,” he writes. “Every move is a back-stabbing Mafia-like protection of the family.” Which raises questions on whether Washington and the Shiite-led government share the same ends in Iraq: “The goal of the Iraqi government,” Haass said in his Senate testimony, “appears to be to establish a country in which the rights and interests of the Shia majority are protected above all else.”
Military analysts question whether a surge of twenty-one thousand troops is enough to do the job. CFR Senior Defense Fellow Stephen Biddle says the surge does not provide the necessary force ratios (generally one soldier per fifty civilians) for a successful counterinsurgency. Others say such a surge may be unsustainable and further damage troop morale (Economist). Casualties can also be expected to climb, as President Bush admitted in his January 10 address. Finally, timelines remain ambiguously open. Military officials admit it may take years to fully secure a city the size of Baghdad, though Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said he expected results within a matter of months. Everyone agrees the risks of failure are great and, as Nabil Salim of Baghdad University tells the Associated Press, “the Iraqi people will pay the highest price.” Last year, more than thirty-four thousand civilians died (BaltSun) in Iraq, according to the United Nations.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
