home > by publication type > daily analysis > Afghanistan, the Other 'Surge'
Email
| Prepared by: | Eben Kaplan |
|---|
British Royal Marines return after a gun-battle with Taliban militants near Kajaki in southern Afghanistan. (AP/Manish Swarup)
The U.S. foreign policy debate these days revolves around President Bush’s controversial “new way forward” in Iraq. Military commanders in Iraq split over the wisdom of adding more troops there, but there is no such division in Afghanistan. Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates told reporters after a recent visit to Kabul: “There’s no reason to sit back and let the Taliban regroup” (NPR). Thus, President Bush will extend the tours of 3,200 troops by four months and ask Congress to invest an additional $10.6 billion into its Afghan campaign (IHT). Kurt Volker, one of the U.S. State Department’s chief officials responsible for NATO policy, tells CFR.org’s Robert McMahon that the United States also wants to resolve the issue of national “caveats” impeding some NATO countries from letting their troops fight the Taliban in Afghanistan. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice met with NATO foreign ministers Friday, urging them to ramp up their own commitments to Afghanistan (BBC).
NATO commanders in the region expect mounting clashes with the resurgent Taliban guerillas, primarily in the south of the country. Lieutenant General Karl Eikenberry, the outgoing top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, told reporters on January 16: “It is going to be a violent spring and we’re going to have violence into the summer.” The U.S. military released annual statistics showing a nearly five-fold increase (Globe & Mail) in direct attacks on NATO forces from 2005 to 2006. The spike in violence comes as Afghans continue to struggle to restore their livelihoods. Washington Post correspondent Pamela Constable says five years after the overthrow of the Taliban, “The country is still so destitute and undeveloped that most inhabitants have no central heating, electricity or running water.”
International force levels have been steadily rising; the nearly twenty-four thousand U.S. troops in Afghanistan slightly outnumber the total number of NATO forces in the country. Any increase in U.S. forces would be small in comparison to 21,500-strong “surge” President Bush plans for Iraq. Washington Post blogger William M. Arkin, a former Army intelligence analyst, said of the recent tough moves from Iraq to Somalia: “The new, new strategy is to pile on.”
While most Americans bristle at the notion of sending additional forces into Iraq—60 percent, according to a recent poll (PDF)—Afghanistan may prove different. A Christian Science Monitor op-ed notes Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joseph Biden’s (D-DE) opinion that “If we're surging troops anywhere, it should be in Afghanistan.” A USA Today editorial also favors more U.S. boots on Afghan soil.
Part of the willingness to accept greater involvement in Afghanistan comes from a more broadly held view that it could actually make a difference. Writing in Foreign Affairs, Afghanistan expert Barnett R. Rubin says the country can only be saved if Western powers increase their commitment. Rubin also advocates a stronger stance on Pakistan, where “the Taliban and al-Qaeda maintain critical sanctuaries,” (PDF) according to recent congressional testimony from outgoing National Intelligence Director John Negroponte.
Secretary Gates also expressed fresh concern about increasing cross-border attacks (Bloomberg) from Pakistan. Many of these fighters continue to come from Pakistan’s somewhat lawless tribal lands, where an agreement between Islamabad and tribal leaders appears to have failed to staunch (IHT) the flow of fighters across the border. This, says the Economist, could be a harbinger of al-Qaeda’s revival.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.