home > by publication type > daily analysis > New Squeeze on Iran
Email
| Prepared by: | Lionel Beehner |
|---|
The U.S. sent its second aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf—a warning to Tehran. (AP/Ronen Zilberman)
An apparent ratcheting up of U.S. pressure on Iran is underway on several fronts. To try to isolate Tehran, Washington has put pressure on foreign banks and financial institutions to sever their ties to Iranian banks, as outlined in this new Backgrounder. Kaveh L. Afrasiabi, an expert on Iranian foreign policy, says in this new CFR.org Podcast this kind of financial squeeze is effective but unlikely to move Iran to renounce its nuclear program. But the U.S. has set other pieces in motion.
U.S. forces recently raided an Iranian consulate in Iraqi Kurdistan and detained alleged members of the Revolutionary Guards accused (BaltSun) of abetting Islamic militants in Iraq. The Pentagon is expected to release a report soon detailing why the Iranian diplomats were detained. Following up on President Bush's January 10 speech on stabilizing Iraq, the White House has authorized U.S. forces to kill or capture Iranian operatives (WashPost) in the country. U.S. officials have reportedly contacted Iran's foreign ministry to try to resolve the dispute (AP).
The United States has also sent its second aircraft carrier strike group to the Persian Gulf, a symbolic gesture aimed at Tehran that enhances the U.S. military's capability to carry out potential air or naval-based strikes against Iranian targets. Bush's appointment of Admiral William Fallon to head Central Command may also signal Washington's greater willingness to wage air or naval-based strikes against Iranian nuclear targets, given the admiral's "vast experience in directing carrier-borne air strikes," writes Martin Sieff, a national security correspondent for UPI. One aim of these maneuvers is to show that the U.S. presence in the region remains strong, notwithstanding military setbacks in Iraq. There is no hope for direct dialogue with the Iranians, the thinking goes, so long as Washington appears to be negotiating from a position of weakness.
The bank squeezes, seizures in Iraq, and movement of carrier groups in the Gulf also appear to be an attempt by Washington to take advantage of perceived divisions within the Iranian regime. In particular, many experts say the Iranian elite may now be reconsidering its approach to retaining a civilian nuclear program. A few editorialists representing Iranian hard-line elites have voiced their displeasure with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's nuclear showmanship. The Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and his chief arms negotiator Ali Larijani, who wield more influence over foreign policy than Ahmadinejad, have indicated they may soften Iran's nuclear stance.
Khameini and other elements within Iran's ruling class appear intent on reining in Ahmadinejad. His anti-Western rhetoric and nuclear posturing, domestic critics say, have only undermined Iran's position and damaged its economy.
The latest UN Security Council resolution, though weakly worded, hurts Iran's standing with the Chinese and Russians, Tehran's erstwhile champions at the United Nations. Meanwhile, a new poll indicates that most Iranians, while supportive of a nuclear program, are more committed to keeping their country in line with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
Gary G. Sick of Columbia University, in a recent interview with CFR.org's Bernard Gwertzman, predicts Iran may still complete its stated goal of linking three thousand centrifuges by March, a small but important step in the nuclear fuel cycle. Such an achievement might allow Tehran space to reenter negotiations with the Europeans and make some concessions. On the other hand, it would throw off some of the more conservative timelines U.S. officials have given to Iran's nuclear program. Even if Iran halts its uranium-enrichment process, CFR Senior Fellow Charles D. Ferguson says the three thousand P1 centrifuges would be "a starter kit to get enough nuclear material to make a bomb within a year."
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.