Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Rethinking Terrorist Financing
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Illegal narcotics, such as these seized in Kabul, Afghanistan, are only one of many sources of terrorist financing. (AP/Emilio Morenatti)
When the 9/11 Commission issued its final report (PDF) in December 2005, it assigned letter grades to rate the federal government’s progress on its various recommendations. Of the forty-one areas considered, combating terrorist financing received the highest mark, an A-. But as he unveiled the latest revision of his National Strategy for Combating Terrorism, President Bush noted that “al-Qaeda continues to adapt in the face of our global campaign against them.” Sue Eckert, an expert in terrorist finance from Brown University, says in this CFR.org Podcast that the U.S. approach to terrorist finance “has not fundamentally changed” since shortly after 9/11. In order for the United States to continue its success in disrupting clandestine financial networks, she says, it must reevaluate its approach.
The post-9/11 financial actions initiated by the United States and its allies successfully froze some $140 million in terrorist funds. With their traditional sources of support gone, terrorist fundraisers have increasingly turned to illegal activities—such as drug smuggling or peddling counterfeit CDs—to bankroll their sinister work (openDemocracy). The expansive, loosely regulated global financial system offers ample opportunities (Foreign Policy) to launder the money with little fear of getting caught.
The formal financial sector has proven one of the most reliable sources of intelligence regarding terrorist networks. David D. Aufhauser, former chair of the National Security Council’s Committee on Terrorist Financing, told a recent CFR meeting, “The evidence that the financial system coughs up is actually true and correct; it doesn't lie.” Thus, terrorists have tried to carry out their attacks on the cheap to avoid detection. As this Backgrounder explains, experts estimate the July 2005 bombing of London’s mass transit system cost as little as two thousand dollars. Though similar attacks cost as much as twenty times that amount, these remain relatively small sums compared to the half million dollars the 9/11 Commission says al-Qaeda spent on the 2001 plot.
Eckert says it remains unclear whether forcing terrorists to rely on black markets for their funds will make it easier or more difficult to detect their activities. Regardless, most ongoing U.S. efforts to combat terrorist financing remain fixated on official channels. The U.S. Treasury Department is developing a data collection system for cross-border financial transactions, though a CATO Policy Analysis suggests that such data-mining systems only have limited usefulness. Earlier this year, the New York Times revealed the Defense Department and Central Intelligence Agency have requested access to Americans’ financial records as part of their counterterrorism intelligence gathering effort. This move pushes the envelope regarding restrictions (WashPost) against either agency engaging in domestic intelligence gathering.
American officials have long maintained lists of terrorist groups and state sponsors of terrorism. The European Union's own counterterrorism strategy includes maintaining a roster (PDF) of terrorist groups. Nations who directly sponsor terrorism or do business with terrorists face a host of penalties (PDF), such as financial restrictions and arms embargoes. The United States recently ratcheted up its sanctions on Iranian financial institutions it believes support terrorism or Iran’s nuclear program. Some evidence exists to suggest this approach works; a Backgrounder describes how Libya got off the list.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Expert Conversations on World Events
In The Closing of the American Border, Edward Alden goes behind the scenes to tell the story of the Bush administration’s struggle to balance security and openness in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
“ Minor League, Major Problems:” Charles Kupchan argues that a league of democracies would not secure cooperation among democracies and would expose the limits of the West's power and legitimacy.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
