China’s Environmental Crisis
February 9, 2007
Introduction
The familiar story of China's economic boom keeps headline writers busy with gross domestic product (GDP) growth hitting 10.7 percent last year. Its booming economy, however, has brought a concurrent environmental crisis. Sixteen of the world's twenty most polluted cities are in China. Beijing's pledge to host a “Green Olympics” in the summer of 2008 signals the country's willingness to address its environmental problems. But with less than two years until the summer games, the country does not look likely to meet its environmental goals.
What has China’s economic boom done to the environment?
China's economy has grown tenfold since 1978, and the focus on development over the environment has led to widespread environmental degradation. “China has gone through an industrialization in the past twenty years that many developing countries needed one hundred years to complete,” says Pan Yue, the deputy director of China's State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA), in a report for Germany's Der Spiegel. But Elizabeth C. Economy, a CFR senior fellow and expert on China's environment, says the argument that China is experiencing the same growing pains as any other industrialized nation “fundamentally mischaracterizes” the issue. The "scale and scope of pollution far outpaces what occurred in the United States and Europe” during their industrial revolutions, she says. Moreover, China's environmental woes have hurt its economy. The damage to the ecosystem costs China about 9 percent of its GDP, according to the United Nations Development Program.
What are some of China’s major environmental challenges?
- Water. China suffers from the twin problems of water shortage and water pollution. About one-third of China's population lacks access to clean drinking water. Its per-capita water supply falls at around a quarter of the global average. Some 70 percent of the country's rivers and lakes are polluted, with roughly two hundred million tons of sewage and industrial waste pouring into Chinese waterways in 2004. As part of its effort to harness the nation's water supply, China has a large dam-building program with over twenty-five thousand dams nationwide–more than any other nation. The dam projects are not only a high cost in terms of money, but also in farmland loss, ecological damage, and forced migration of millions of people, says the Woodrow Wilson Center's Jennifer L. Turner, director of its China Environment Forum, in a report for the Jamestown Foundation.
- Land. Desertification in China leads to the loss of about 5,800 square miles of grasslands every year, an area roughly the size of Connecticut. The Worldwatch Institute, an environmental watchdog and research organization, reports that excessive farm cultivation, particularly overgrazing, is one of the leading causes of desertification. The cultivation stems from a policy followed from the 1950s to the early 1980s that encouraged farmers to settle in grasslands. As the deforestation grows, so do the number of sandstorms; a hundred were expected between 2000 and 2009, more than a fourfold increase over the previous decade. Desertification also contributes to China's air pollution problems, with increasing dust causing a third of China's air pollution.
- Greenhouse gases. China is poised to become the world's biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, overtaking the United States as the globe's leading source of carbon emissions, by 2009, according to the International Energy Agency. This is more than a decade earlier than previously predicted. Coal accounts for over two-thirds of China's energy consumption and contributes to sulfur dioxide emissions causing acid rain, which falls on over 30 percent of the country.
- Population and development. In spite of laws targeting population control, China's inhabitants number more than 1.3 billion. The country's growing economic prosperity and rapid development mean increasing urbanization, consumerism, and pollution. One example of this can be seen in car production: As Kelly Sims Gallagher notes in her book, China Shifts Gears, China produced 42,000 passenger cars in 1990. By 2004, the number hit one million, with sixteen million cars on China's roads. By 2000, motor vehicles were the leading cause of China's urban air pollution, even though China adheres to stricter mileage standards than the United States.
How has the Chinese public responded to the environmental threat?
The government received six hundred thousand environment-related complaints in 2006, a figure that has risen roughly 30 percent each year since 2002. Aside from economic concerns over the cost of environmental degradation, the government recognizes that environment-related social unrest threatens central authority. In May 2006, China Daily reported that roughly fifty thousand environmental disputes took place during the prior year. This mirrors an overall trend of a rise in the number of protests over the past decade, fueled by a sense of individual rights related to increasing openness and prosperity. Despite the central government's attempts to control the media and particularly the Internet, news of unrest spreads among China's growing number of web users and inspires copycat protests, explained in an essay by the American Enterprise Institute's Steven F. Hayward.
What has China done to improve the situation?
Chinese government agencies do target offenders and pass regulations aimed at raising environmental standards. One example: As of January 2007, new apartment and office buildings must meet energy efficiency standards and owners of existing constructions will be expected to spend an estimated $200 million to improve efficiency before 2020, by which time the number of buildings in China is expected to nearly double. Also in January, the State Environmental Protection Agency banned four major power firms and four highly-polluted cities from embarking on new developments until existing projects comply with environmental standards. The crackdown came after China reported it had not only failed to meet energy consumption and emission reduction goals in 2006, but that energy consumption had actually increased during the first half of the year.
CFR's Economy says the passage of such laws and accompanying pressure to comply–are used mostly to send a message: “‘We're serious and here's what's going to happen.’” But such moves often serve as public relations rather than affecting real environmental protection outcomes. If enterprises and local governments prefer paying low fines than following the rules or implementing more expensive environmentally-friendly practices. “If the incentives aren't there they won't use them,” says Economy.
Is China’s national environmental agency an effective watchdog?
No. Various agencies share the role of managing environmental protection, depending on the pollution problem. However, responsibility rests primarily with the State Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) at the national level. SEPA experienced a broad expansion of power to enforce regulations in the late 1990s as environmental protection grew in importance for the central government. The agency also releases an annual report on the state of China's environment (PDF).
Economy notes in her book, The River Runs Black, that SEPA has seen its mandate weakened by “the low level of funding accorded environmental protection” as well as the funneling of power and international environmental funds to other state agencies.
Which government agencies monitor the environment at the local level?
Environmental protection bureaus (EPB) monitor environmental conditions at the local level. Their relative weakness obstructs environmental protection in China despite the bureaus' seemingly large manpower. China's roughly 2,500 EPBs employ some sixty thousand people. While SEPA maintains a supervisory role, the EPBs report to local governments for budget and resource support. Not only are the bureaus therefore beholden to local authorities, but their monitoring teams are typically ill equipped and inadequately staffed to handle regular inspections of factories and other industrial facilities. The bureaus are also responsible for collecting pollution-related fines, a corrupt system in which the underfunded bureaus use the fees to pay their own wages and face obstacles when collecting fines, particularly from state-owned enterprises. In some cases, the process results in “a perverse incentive for EPBs to encourage the persistence of pollution problems,” writes Economy.
Given the inefficacy of the bureaus, SEPA often relies on small, local environmental organizations to monitor environmental conditions.
What is the role of local non-governmental organizations?
With the limitations of environmental success at the local level, the central government began a registry for environmental organizations in 1994. China's roughly two thousand independent environmental NGOs now form the largest segment of the country's civil society. At the same time, the number of student environmental groups on campuses has been on the rise, reaching approximately two hundred across the country. These NGOs make crucial environmental information available to the public, “a remarkable achievement for a society whose access to information is often restricted,” writes the Wilson Center's Turner. The groups also work with SEPA, serving as the agency's “eyes and ears at the local level,” testified Economy at a 2005 Congressional Executive Commission on China roundtable.
However, as the “green” groups become more vocal and identified with social unrest. The NGO's and associated lawyers have faced "major obstacles or backlash from local governments and industries," says the World Watch Institute's State of the World 2006. Another limitation for many Chinese NGOs is financial dependence on international organizations.
What role does the international community play in China’s environmental policy?
U.S. and European foundations have been active in supporting both local and international environmental projects in China. International organizations not only provide funding to local environmental organizations, but also draw Chinese NGOs into projects to assist with shaping environmental policymaking in China. With the effects of China's greenhouse gas emissions serving as growing concern, the United Nations and China plan to launch a pilot carbon credit exchange (FT) in Beijing. Beijing has ratified the UN's Kyoto Accords aimed at curbing global greenhouse gas emissions. However, as a developing nation China does not have to comply with the agreement's standards until 2012.
What is the U.S. position on China’s environmental troubles?
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency signed a 2003 agreement with SEPA through various programs targeting China's air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. China's environmental record also has become an issue for some in the American labor movement who believe Washington should demand higher standards for environmental, worker protection, and human rights in exchange for the free access Beijing enjoys to the American market. But Economy warns that, despite international anxiety over global warming, other nations are “far more likely to use encouragement than pressure” when it comes to China's environmental challenge. Given the United States' poor record on environmental issues such as climate change and importing illegally logged timber, Washington “is in no position to say anything to China,” she says.
What impact has the 2008 Olympics had on China’s environmental policy?
As part of Beijing's bid to host the summer games, China promised a “green” Olympics. Since then, Beijing has witnessed some improvements in terms of cutting down pollution, with improved air quality each year since 2001. By the time the Olympics begin, Beijing is expected to have relocated one hundred factories outside the city and replaced some three hundred thousand taxis and buses with less-polluting vehicles. The city also intends to invest in new subway lines as part of an improved public transportation system.
Still, only two-thirds of the time could Beijing's air quality be considered “good” last year. As the Olympics get closer, the city has come up with a contingency plan to clear the air during the games: closing down businesses and offering extended vacations for city inhabitants.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Email
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
After two decades of liberalization, many countries around the world are adopting new restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) that could retard continued progress. The authors make recommendations for correcting this protectionist drift by proposing guidelines for how countries can better regulate FDI yet still reap its economic benefits.
In this Council Special Report, the authors make a strong case that the Bush administration’s policy of diplomatic isolation of Syria is not serving U.S. interests, and offer informed history and thoughtful analysis of the country and its external behavior.
