home > by publication type > daily analysis > Iran’s Undeterred Nuclear Quest
Email
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Iran is moving ahead with its nuclear program, despite UN pressure. (AP/Vahid Salemi)
Iran failed to meet a sixty-day deadline set by the UN Security Council to suspend its nuclear program, according to a new report (NYT) by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). In fact, the UN nuclear agency said Iran was expanding its enrichment work, with close to one thousand centrifuges in operation at its Natanz facility. Iranian officials have announced their intention soon to complete a cascade of three thousand centrifuges, the scale of uranium enrichment devices necessary to produce a nuclear bomb. But a top Iranian nuclear official repeated Tehran’s condemnation of what he called the "illegal and politically motivated" (IRNA) Security Council resolution. The five veto-wielding members of the Council agreed on Monday to start work (Reuters) on a new resolution regarding Iran. The BBC says a new round of sanctions could involve further travel bans on Iranian officials linked to the country’s nuclear program.
CFR Director of Studies Gary Samore, a former Clinton administration nuclear negotiator, says an optimistic explanation of Iran’s actions is that the country wants to have a three-thousand-centrifuge facility in place at Natanz so it can claim a technical objective before returning seriously to talks and putting a suspension back in place. But Samore is doubtful whether Iran will move to give up its nuclear program. Rhetorically, at least, Tehran has used the sixty-day UN compliance deadline to reassert its right to develop peaceful nuclear technology. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad this week spoke out against international efforts to “bully” Iran (IRNA) and said nuclear energy is important (ISNA) for “the progress and honor of the country.” He also said the country was ready to halt enrichment if Western states did the same. This continues a pattern of defiance following Western-led efforts in the past year to offer carrots for Iranian cooperation, then threats, and finally the December 23 resolution banning the supply of materials and technology that could be used to build nuclear weapons.
The Council's previous resolution called for additional sanctions in the event of noncompliance. Even Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has fended off calls in the past for tougher measures, has expressed frustration with Iran’s response to the resolution. Russia also recently gave notice that Iran has fallen behind on payments for construction of the Bushehr light-water reactor, though some analysts interpreted the announcement as a Russian ploy (Kommersant) for bargaining power ahead of the UN talks.
Even if the United States and its allies make little progress pushing for new multilateral sanctions—such as a possible arms embargo on Tehran—Washington seems likely to continue placing financial pressure on foreign companies doing business in Iran, as this Backgrounder explains. For their part, EU nations have announced they will move forward with a ban on selling nuclear-related goods to Iran. But Gary Milhollin of the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control and Valerie Lincy of Iranwatch.org write that the EU announcement failed (NYT) to explicitly crack down on many subsidiary firms that supply the Iranian regime with such materials.
Increased international pressure on Iran is likely to be met with defiance, CFR Senior Fellow Ray Takeyh told a recent hearing of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Takeyh downplayed the impact of a policy of coercion or pressure, saying “in the end, a diplomatic engagement between the United States and Iran may be the only manner of tempering the theocracy’s more troublesome designs.” But Michael Rubin and Danielle Pletka of the American Enterprise Institute, writing in the Wall Street Journal, call such diplomatic efforts “naïve and dangerous” and warn that “experience shows that engagement means something different in Iran than in the West.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.