home > by publication type > daily analysis > India’s Internal Terror Troubles
Email
| Prepared by: | Carin Zissis |
|---|
Maoist insurgents, known as Naxalites, prepare to surrender to local authorities. (AP Photo)
While Kashmir and al-Qaeda-linked terrorism garner front-page play around the world, India's own internal terrorism problem tends to be off the radar of most American news outlets—or, at best, warranting a postage-stamp-sized wire story (NYT) buried at the bottom of an inside page. Yet terrorism-related deaths in the contested territory of Jammu and Kashmir dropped threefold since 2002, according to the South Asia Terrorism Portal report. Violence related to Maoist extremism in India, however, defies New Delhi’s counterterrorism efforts. In April 2006, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh called the leftist insurgency “the single biggest internal security challenge ever faced by our country.” A new Backgrounder on terrorism in India explores the Maoist insurgency.
Maoist extremists, known as Naxalites for the West Bengali village of Naxalbari where they held their first revolt in 1967, emerged as a renewed militant force in 2004 when various factions aligned in a loose coalition. Bolstered by advances of Maoists in Nepal, the Naxalites are increasingly active in a swath of territory called the “red corridor” running across thirteen states in central and south India.
A report by the New Delhi-based Asian Center for Human Rights documenting the Naxalite rise from the “periphery to mainstream” (PDF) in 2006 estimates the insurgency has as many as ten thousand recruits. Chhattisgarh, an impoverished state where the extremists take refuge in deep forests and reportedly set up local councils that collect taxes from the population, experienced the highest rate of Naxalite-related violence last year. Nearly four hundred people died in clashes between Maoist forces and a controversial paramilitary group called Salwa Judum caused the forcible displacement of more than 43,700 people. The Guardian reports that New Delhi backs the militia Salwa Judum in a struggle over Chhattisgarh’s mineral-rich soil.
The Naxalites’ growing power also stems from the failure of India’s economic boom to trickle-down to the rural, impoverished areas where the Maoists make inroads. A special report by the Economist faults the Indian state with leaving the Naxalite problem to local policing and failing to come up with a consistent national policy. The article says the insurgency attacks India “where it is weakest: in delivering basic government services to those who need them most.” The New Delhi-based Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies echoes this sentiment in a report on the leftists that outlines rampant underdevelopment (PDF) in troubled Chhattisgarh: Fewer than half the state’s children enroll in primary school, 40 percent of the population lives in poverty, and more than two-thirds of households have no electricity.
The Maoists profess to defend the rights of the impoverished, but their war on the Indian state involves extortion, forcible recruitment, and attacks using homemade bombs and light arms, according to Human Rights Watch. Although the insurgency remains rural in nature, the South Asia Terrorism Portal reports the Naxalites are setting their sights on Indian cities, with plans to recruit students and the “urban unemployed.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.