Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Tracking Rail Security
| Prepared by: | Eben Kaplan |
|---|
Despite increased police presence, passenger trains remain vulnerable. (AP/Josh Reynolds)
This month, both the House of Representatives (PDF) and the Senate consider legislation aimed at improving security on U.S. railways. Over the course of that month, Americans will make nearly three hundred million trips on trains, subways, and commuter rails as they traverse the nation’s 160,000 miles of lightly guarded train track. U.S. reliance on railroads has increased in recent years, and some suggest that trend will only continue. Senator Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ) describes new legislative initiatives as an effort to “fundamentally change the way America travels” by providing alternatives to crowded roads and airports. Though railways traditionally rank among the safest modes of transport, this new Backgrounder points out that trains, both passenger and freight, represent some of the likeliest terrorist targets in the nation.
Most public concern revolves around the vulnerability of commuter trains. Bombings in Madrid, London, and Mumbai over the last three years have driven home the vulnerabilities of easily accessible mass transit systems. Since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, rail carriers have implemented a number of security measures—such as heightened police presence, closed circuit surveillance cameras, and public awareness campaigns—to help prevent an attack. But Richard Falkenrath, New York City’s top counterterrorism official, told a March 6 House hearing that an attack on New York’s subway system remains likely (PDF).
Attacks on freight trains pose a far greater menace than backpack bombs on subways. Should a tanker car full of toxic inhalants—such as chlorine gas or anhydrous ammonia—rupture in a densely populated area, some experts believe the ensuing gas cloud (PBS) could kill up to one hundred thousand people. That is a worst-case scenario, which some find far-fetched. A perhaps more plausible estimate from the Homeland Security Council remains disturbing, suggesting the death toll from a chlorine release in a major city would reach 17,500 (PDF).
In the same March 6 congressional hearing Falkenrath spoke at, Edward R. Hamburger, president of the Association of American Railroads, detailed the numerous precautions taken by the rail industry. These are not enough, says Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reporter Carl Prine in this CFR.org Podcast. In his own investigations, Prine repeatedly gained unrestricted access to large shipments of lethal chemicals, often in densely populated areas.
Passenger security needs improving too, says P.J. Crowley, a homeland security expert at the Center for American Progress. He says Congress should provide funds to sustain an even larger police presence on trains and in stations. “It takes more than money to protect everyone all the time,” write Frank J. Cilluffo and Laura P. Keith, both experts at the Homeland Security Policy Institute, in USA Today. They suggest more random, or “chaotic,” security measures could present terrorists with a harder target.
TSA Rail Security Fact Sheet | CRS: Passenger Rail Security (PDF) | GAO: Passenger Rail Security (PDF)
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
