Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Making Ethanol Policy Practical
| Prepared by: | Lee Hudson Teslik |
|---|
A Brazilian ethanol plant. Brazil is the world's leading producer of ethanol. (AP/Victor R. Caivano)
On March 9, the U.S. and Brazilian presidents signed a pact agreeing to share technologies and some development costs in ethanol production. The agreement was described as a U.S. attempt (Telegraph) to “mend fences in its own backyard,” but nonetheless raised some eyebrows for what it seemingly ignored. As the Financial Times put it, the deal “fails to address the central issue of access to the U.S. market for Brazilian producers”—that is, the substantial tariffs levied on countries like Brazil trying to import ethanol into the United States.
More generally, the deal highlighted the uneven path the United States has taken toward modernizing its energy policies. Since January 2006, when President Bush outlined a plan for establishing American “energy independence” in his State of the Union address, the United States has encouraged ethanol production—including the implementation of massive and hotly contested (IHT) subsidies for U.S. corn producers. But other alternative energy strategies have gotten far less attention, including methods Bush specifically mentioned in his speech. An October 2006 CFR Task Force report argues a lack of sustained attention to energy issues is undermining both U.S. foreign policy and national security. The report presses for increases in both fossil fuel exploration and alternative energy research. More recently, a March 13 CFR symposium on energy policy questioned whether alternative sources of energy are a "panacea or pipe dream."
The new Democrat-controlled Congress has signaled it will be looking to expand alternative energy choices. But for the moment, the focus appears to rest squarely on ethanol. Bush has called for quotas that would require production of 35 billion gallons of fuel annually from alternative energy sources by 2017. But ethanol production, despite tripling in the past six years, currently provides only five billion gallons of fuel per year, and sky-high tariffs of fifty-four cents per gallon make large-scale importation more or less impossible.
To boost these numbers, the U.S. government has implemented a fifty-one cent per gallon subsidy on ethanol. But corn is still an expensive commodity, and the production of corn-based ethanol is sufficiently inefficient that the government concedes it will be years before new biotechnologies could provide a viable alternative to gasoline on the open consumer market.
For Washington to meet its stated targets, CFR Senior Fellow Edward Alden and Brazil expert Paulo Sotero argue the United States must increase (WashPost) its ethanol imports. Alden and Sotero say a “modified tariff scheme well short of a full repeal” could help make this possible. A new report (PDF) from the Brookings Institution recommends that the United States make an effort to proactively “transform its auto fleet” to hybrid and flex-fuel vehicles, given that the vast majority of American cars cannot run on ethanol products, even if they were made more cost-effective.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
