home > by publication type > daily analysis > Changing Mood on Carbon Caps
Email
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Both the private sector and U.S. states are becoming more proactive in terms of reducing harmful emissions. (AP/Natacha Pisarenko)
The scientific squabbles on climate change have yielded increasingly to consensus. “The scientific community has shifted from skepticism to near-unanimous acceptance of the evidence of an artificial greenhouse effect,” argues Gregg Easterbrook of the Brookings Institution. The February 2007 report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change declared with 90 percent certainty that human activity was responsible for global warming. “The science on this question has been settled,” says Rep. John Dingell (D-MI), a global warming skeptic-turned-convert who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
Washington’s attention, of course, carries the most significance, and many believe the change in attitude of an auto industry stalwart like Dingell signals changes in the U.S. approach to global warming. Tapping into the new zeitgeist (NYT) this week is former Vice President and recent Oscar winner Al Gore, who addressed both houses of Congress. The different bills before lawmakers call for a national cap-and-trade system for carbon emissions, whereby companies can then buy or sell their pollution allowance, a system similar to one created under the 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act, explained in this Backgrounder.
Rep. Dingell showed teeth when auto-industry leaders appeared before a House subcommittee in the first of a series of high-profile appearances by business leaders. He warned them that “inaction will not work, and telling us what doesn’t work is useful but no longer sufficient.” Leaders from the Big Three and Toyota, as well as the United Auto Workers union, stressed that increased gas mileage standards—CAFE standards —would wreak havoc on the economic health of the industry. But the group did pledge to work with Congress to find solutions.
Automakers aren’t the only industry engaging with Congress on climate change, as the private sector becomes increasingly active, hoping to have a hand in the creation of a new, carbon-regulated business environment and avoid “a patchwork of state and local emission controls.” Some groups have already begun, participating in the Chicago Climate Exchange (SunTimes), a voluntary but binding cap-and-trade program.
On March 19, sixty-five companies under the banner of the Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies (Ceres) called for “leadership by the U.S. government to achieve sizable, sensible long-term reductions (NYT) of greenhouse gas emissions”. Where leadership in the 1970s and 1980s on U.S. environmental legislation used to come from the executive, initiative now springs largely from the collusion between the private sector and advocacy groups. Businesses want “clear, consistent regulation legislation,” (Spiegel) while environmental groups are eschewing zero-tolerance policies in favor of more politically acceptable cap-and-trade, market-based systems. James Rogers of Duke Energy said at a recent CFR energy symposium that “virtually every company there believes we'll live in a carbon-constrained world in the future, and we have to find a way to provide reliable service in the context of these carbon constraints.”
States are also sending a strong message to Washington. California recently became the first state to limit carbon emissions, with twenty-eight states following suit. California joined forces with four western states to set targets (Seattle Post Intelligencer) for greenhouse reduction and possibly create a regional cap-and-trade system, with similar cooperation (Morning Sentinel) in the Northeast. An estimated 409 cities have taken some climate change-related action, with municipalities in Vermont voting to pressure (NYT) Congress on climate change.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Global Economy in Crisis
Expert Conversations on World Events
In The Closing of the American Border, Edward Alden goes behind the scenes to tell the story of the Bush administration’s struggle to balance security and openness in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
“ The Logic of Zero:” Ivo Daalder and Jan Lodal say Washington must lead the way to a world without nuclear weapons. The first step will be dramatically limiting the U.S. nuclear arsenal's declared size and purpose.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
