home > by publication type > daily analysis > New Voices of America
Email
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Some criticize Alhurra, a satellite television station financed by the U.S. government, for "questionable coverage." (AP/Mahmoud Tawil)
The annual U.S. budget debates spotlight huge outlays for areas like defense, agriculture, and foreign aid. To the extent international broadcasting gets mentioned at all, it usually involves a debate over reshuffling priorities—choosing one language and region over another in the competition for resources. This year, that concern is focused on proposed reductions (VOA) in English-language broadcasts on the Voice of America, and in foreign-language broadcasts to the former Soviet sphere, as well as to Tibet (Variety.com).
But the overall budget sought by the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), which oversees U.S.-funded international broadcasting, is by no means insignificant. At nearly $670 million (PDF), it would represent a continued spending surge for such broadcasting since 9/11, and is comparable to funding levels during the height of the Cold War. In scope and technology, the new broadcasters have moved far beyond the shortwave-radio era, as this new Backgrounder notes. There are new programs in Arabic, Farsi, Urdu, and other languages deemed crucial in contesting the “global war on terror.” In addition to radio transmissions, U.S. broadcasters now stream broadcasts online, send text information via cell phone, and beam satellite television to the Middle East. Web sites run by the seven U.S.-funded broadcast entities record tens of millions of page views per month.
Yet measuring the impact of the U.S.-funded entities has proven difficult. The nonpartisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) has repeatedly called on the BBG to come up with a strategy for gauging the results of its Muslim-focused broadcasts. A report released in August 2006 repeated these concerns and found the Middle East broadcasts, which receive the lion’s share of new funding, use flawed methodology (PDF) in measuring audiences. The BBG has pledged to respond to the GAO concerns. Meanwhile, it continues to fend off criticisms that its music-based programming to Arabic- and Farsi-speaking audiences lacks credibility. Others say a station like VOA is ill-equipped to compete with popular sifters of U.S. culture such as YouTube (IHT) At the same time, congressional experts like Mark Helmke, a senior Republican staffer for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, tells CFR.org that the new broadcast entities have not demonstrated they are sophisticated enough to explain U.S. foreign policy to their audiences.
This year’s budget debate also occurs at a time of new concern over the content of reports by some of the new Farsi- and Arabic-language services. Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK), the ranking Republican on the Senate Homeland Security Subcommittee on Government Information, has raised alarm over Radio Farda, singling out what he said was questionable coverage (WashTimes) of President Bush’s State of the Union address. And a recent op-ed from Joel Mowbray in the Wall Street Journal said Alhurra TV is ignoring what he called “Arab voices for freedom,” while airing live speeches from Hezbollah and Hamas leaders.
Some international broadcasting experts say clarity will only come to U.S. broadcasts when greater attention is paid to the BBG, its oversight board. The board currently has two vacancies and the remaining six appointed slots are all expired, giving it a lame-duck quality (WashPost) In the raft of public diplomacy reports since 9/11, a number of them called for consolidating broadcasters into one entity. A Heritage Foundation paper urged curtailing the BBG’s role to an advisory capacity. Alvin Snyder, who once directed the former U.S. Information Agency’s TV and film service, says it would be better to make the BBG chairman full time (PDF) to devote his attention to guiding the unwieldy domain of U.S. international broadcasting.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
This report outlines the nature of the challenges in Pakistan's tribal areas, formulates strategies for addressing those challenges, and distills the strategies into realistic policy proposals worthy of consideration by the incoming administration.
This report analyzes the debate over U.S. use of assurances against torture, explaining the contexts in which they are used, how they can be conveyed, and what they can contain, and recommends a number of ways to respond to criticism so that the United States can continue using assurances.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
“The Right Way to Engage China” Henry M. Paulson argues that the prosperity of the United States and China depends on helping China to further integrate into the global economic system.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
