home > by publication type > daily analysis > Gauging the Surge
Email
| Prepared by: | CFR.org Staff |
|---|
An Iraq soldier controls an intersection in Sadr City in Baghdad. Shiite slums like Sadr City have been temporarily cleared of militias. (AP Photo/Adil al-Khazali)
After years of facing relatively few obstacles to his Iraq policies from the legislative branch, President George W. Bush now confronts dual resolutions (WashPost) from both chambers of Congress demanding an end to combat operations there sometime next year. The Senate's vote to set a March 31, 2008 deadline for ending U.S. combat operations in Iraq, passed by a slim 50-48 margin, may be vetoed by the president. But it definitively ends a period beginning with a vote in 2002 to grant Bush broad warmaking powers in which Congress has deferred to the executive on such issues.
The vote will fuel a new debate over whether Congress has finally owned up to its obligations (WashTimes) or is vastly overreaching itself (USA Today). A more cynical view from Los Angeles Times columnist Ronald Brownstein is that politics, and not principle, drives both sides of the debate. CFR Senior Fellow Peter Beinert argues in TIME that the Democrats are right, both in the policy sense and politically, to force this debate. This Council Special Report by CFR Senior Fellow Steven Simon urged a similar course, though only after the latest increase in U.S. troops in Iraq was given time to have effect.
The president and his mostly Republican supporters argue the latest policy change in Iraq—the "surge" of over 20,000 new U.S. troops into the country—has not had time to prove itself. Baghdad’s death rate is down, according to an update from Kenneth Katzman of the Congressional Research Service, but bombings in “belts” around the capital and area provinces like Diyalah are up. U.S. casualties are down in February, but a number of well-coordinated suicide attacks, particularly one against Shiite pilgrims en route to Karbala, suggest that sectarian violence remains. “There is a real glimmer of hope, but no proof of progress” (NYT), write the Brookings Institution’s Jason Campbell and Michael O’Hanlon. General David Patraeus also sounded optimistic (BBC) and said by early summer a clearer picture of the strategy’s effectiveness should emerge. The surge is not even half-complete, he added. Only ten thousand out of an expected twenty-five thousand additional American soldiers have been deployed.
The surge also consists of roughly thirty joint U.S.-Iraqi security bases scattered throughout Baghdad to allow U.S. and Iraqi forces greater round-the-clock access to insecure neighborhoods, writes Monte Morin in Stars & Stripes. Markets in the capital are closed to daytime vehicle traffic. The result has been a drop in civilian casualties (WashPost), Pentagon officials say. Previously deserted neighborhoods, such as the Karada district in eastern Baghdad, have returned to life. Shiite slums like Sadr City have been temporarily cleared of militias. And the Shiite Mahdi Army, while not exactly neutered, has been quieter as of late and lying low. To try to boost nonmilitary efforts to stabilize Iraq, policymakers from Iraq and its six neighbors recently released the "Marmara Declaration" (PDF) outlining 36 further steps. Among them was a reform of de-Baathification laws, which the declaration said was “essential to national reconciliation, as well as to gaining political support from Sunni Arab states.” Iraq’s prime minister and president this week followed up by approving a draft law allowing members of Saddam’s former ruling Baath party, mostly Sunnis, to return to public sector jobs. But the measure was drawing fire (Reuters) Tuesday from an independent Iraqi panel that oversaw the purge of Baathist officials.
While the surge has produced some modicum of security, it has not tempered Iraqis’ views of the American occupation. An ABC News poll finds that more than half of Iraq’s population, as opposed to 17 percent in 2004, now views violence against Americans (AP) as acceptable. Just 43 percent of Iraqis favor a pluralist form of democracy (USAToday)—down from 57 percent before the December 2005 elections.
Confidence in the war has also slipped stateside. Just 35 percent of Americans now support the president’s course in the war, according to a new CNN poll. Yet strangely, some pundits on both sides of the political spectrum now say the surge should be given a chance. “The odds are against it,” writes John Farmer of the Star-Ledger. “But if it does work … something of value might yet be salvaged from a monumental American mistake, not a democracy for sure but at least a reasonably stable country free of the clutches of Iraq or al-Qaeda.” Michael Boyle of the Guardian says the surge’s results have been “mixed at best” but admits “the number of bullet-ridden bodies scattered around Baghdad, perhaps the most regular and chilling reminder of the brutality of this war, has also dropped significantly.”
Iraq Study Group Report | Council Special Report: After the Surge
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Global Economy in Crisis
Expert Conversations on World Events
In The Closing of the American Border, Edward Alden goes behind the scenes to tell the story of the Bush administration’s struggle to balance security and openness in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
“ The Logic of Zero:” Ivo Daalder and Jan Lodal say Washington must lead the way to a world without nuclear weapons. The first step will be dramatically limiting the U.S. nuclear arsenal's declared size and purpose.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
