home > by publication type > daily analysis > Patching up the Patent System
Email
| Prepared by: | Lee Hudson Teslik |
|---|
The BlackBerry email device was involved in a long-running patent dispute. (AP/Richard Drew)
A battle pitting business-world behemoths against one another is brewing in Congress as legislators consider an overhaul of U.S. patent law. The reforms, which seek to dampen a recent surge in patent legislation and to clarify ambiguities (Bloomberg) in Internet-technology law, have for years been trumpeted by tech-industry lobbyists. They are strongly opposed by pharmaceutical and biotech companies, which fear stricter regulations will make it harder to protect claims on new chemical compounds. With Democrats controlling Congress, the reforms are far more likely to pass—the legislation’s drug-industry opponents have overwhelmingly backed Republicans over the past five years. Now a $1.52 billion February 2007 verdict against Microsoft (MarketWatch) has brought the debate to a head, and analysts predict Congress could press for reforms in the near future.
The core issue in the patent debate is how to balance the positive effect patents have on technological innovation and the negative effect they have on competition and the diffusion of new technologies. Efforts to strike this balance have been complicated, however, as the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has become backlogged (CNN) with far more patent applications than its staff can manage. The negative impact of this pileup is twofold: First, some industry analysts say patents of dubious merit, or patents filed solely to stir up a lawsuit, are often granted (Wired). Second, the authority of patents is undermined more generally and the incentive to innovate is weakened. An erosion of patent protections has broad economic ramifications—a 2005 study (PDF) by a lobby group called USA for Innovation values U.S. intellectual property at $5.5 trillion, or roughly 40 percent of gross domestic product.
With these concerns already in the air, the Microsoft case was a wakeup call for tech titans. In the past, tech firms had shied away from attacking each other on intellectual property rights, with a tacit understanding that prosecuting minor patent violations meant a kind of mutually assured destruction. But when Lucent-Alcatel went after Microsoft for using certain patented MP3 products—and won—observers worried that without swift action to limit damages in similar suits, the legislative floodgates might swing open (ZDNet UK).
So what is to be done? If a new bill is passed, experts say reforms would likely include limitations on the damages that can be paid on infringement suits and clauses to make it easier for targets of litigation to challenge frivolous patents. These revisions would be in line with the recommendations of a November 2006 CFR Special Report. The report cautions against a system that encourages “extraction of payments from legitimate competitors,” and also looks more broadly at U.S. efforts to encourage patent protections overseas.
Simultaneously, the U.S. patent office is seeking to expand (WashPost) its thinly stretched operations and aims to hire 1,200 new filings examiners each of the next five years. These reforms aren’t without their critics. A recent Wall Street Journal op-ed argues that in its quest to stamp out “patent trolls”—people who buy up scores of patents in the hope of winning a lucrative lawsuit if one is violated—the government runs the risk of stifling innovation by making patents harder to come by for inventors. Still, there is broad agreement that the system needs reform; the question is where to strike the balance.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.