home > by publication type > daily analysis > Colombia’s Parapolitics
Email
| Prepared by: |
|---|
General Mario Montoya, commander of Colombia's army, is at the center of the country's paramilitary scandal. (AP/Luis Benavides)
Cocaine is back in fashion among the rich and fabulous, according to W magazine. The music community is abuzz as well; so many hip-hop artists are rapping about dealing “snow” that critics have dubbed a new subgenre—cocaine rap (New Yorker). Such anecdotal evidence suggests the United States is losing the war on drugs. Yet Colombia—the source of nearly 90 percent of the cocaine entering the United States—remains the United States’ closest ally in Latin America, not to mention the recipient of some $5.4 billion in aid since 2000 through Plan Colombia, an ambitious and widely criticized counternarcotics initiative.
On a much-publicized visit to Bogota in mid-March, President Bush spent just a few hours with Colombian President Alvaro Uribe but praised his efforts to combat narcotics trafficking and improve security. “I’m proud to call you a personal friend,” he said, “and I’m proud to call your country a strategic ally of the United States.” The Colombians were less enthusiastic: Local media offered biting criticism (The Week) of Bush and remarked on the necessity of bringing over twenty thousand police in for security despite the billions in counternarcotics aid the United States has poured into the country.
The Colombian population may be anti-Bush, but it’s adamantly pro-Uribe. Since taking office in 2002, Uribe has increased security in Colombia’s three primary cities and precipitated an economic upturn, changes most attribute to his crackdown on the country’s left-wing guerrillas and initiation of a disarmament program for its right-wing paramilitaries. Some 72 percent of the population still approve (Angus Reid) of their president’s performance, despite the paramilitary scandal currently rocking the country. The widening scandal links outlawed right-wing paramilitary groups with top government officials, including the former foreign minister, at least one state governor, several legislators, and the head of the national police, but it has yet to touch Uribe. New intelligence, reported by the Los Angeles Times, alleges the head of the army collaborated with paramilitary groups on military sweeps to eradicate left-wing militias.
As this 2005 Amnesty International report shows, human rights groups have leveled similar charges for years. The report says all parties—the Colombian security forces, the left-wing militias, and the right-wing paramilitaries—are all guilty of human rights abuses but the paramilitaries are the worst offenders. Yet the Economist argues that greater security, brought by Uribe’s more robust army, has enabled the paramilitary investigations to occur in the first place. “Witnesses are coming forward because they do not have to fear,” says Mario Iguaran, the attorney-general.
Consolidating the security further to bring lasting peace to Colombia may prove difficult. There are signs the paramilitary scandal could affect (AP) congressional deliberations over U.S. aid to Colombia. Though few experts anticipate significant cuts in aid, many remain pessimistic that the United States will shift the balance of aid away from military funding to economic development, despite widespread criticism of such an approach (An Andes 2020 report argued in 2004 that Plan Colombia is too narrowly focused on counter narcotics and security).
Uribe has announced an ambitious six-year plan, the so-called Plan Colombia II (Miami Herald), which seems to have taken this criticism into account. Emphasizing economic development, 58 percent of its funds would go toward economic and social projects.
Adam Isacson at the Center for International Policy expresses optimism that congressional Democrats might support such a program. In the Washington Post, Marcela Sanchez argues that the United States should expand its funding of Colombia’s judicial system, which is charged with building cases against over fifty paramilitary commanders as well as uncovering links between the paramilitaries and the government.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.