Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Crunch Time for Trade
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Media workers in Seoul rallied against a proposed U.S.-South Korea trade deal. (AP Photo/ Lee Jin-man)
A bilateral trade agreement with South Korea hangs in the balance as U.S. free trade negotiations arrive at their eleventh hour (CQ) before a March 31 deadline. The deadline is both symbolic and statutory: President Bush’s fast track trade promotion authority (TPA), which allows him to negotiate trade deals independent of Congress, doesn’t expire until June 30. But passing a new trade deal before TPA expires requires the president to put Congress on notice by March 31.
The administration also hopes to pass deals with Panama, Peru, and Colombia, but these pacts pale in economic potential compared to the South Korea agreement. Even if targeted liberalizations are watered down in the process of negotiations, the deal would still be the biggest U.S. pact since the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement and South Korea’s most extensive trade deal ever. As the final days of negotiations neared, analysts expressed optimism that the passage of a deal was increasingly likely (Reuters) as the two sides pushed through obstacles on protected goods including rice and automobiles. But mid-Friday, the U.S. tone turned darker and officials said talks were "not going well" (FT).
The deal has its enemies. It sparked protests (Yonhap) this week in Seoul, and three South Korean lawmakers held a highly publicized hunger strike. The negotiations also drew criticism from some U.S. companies, including Chevron, which seeks tougher investor protections (MarketWatch).
The proposed deals with Panama, Colombia, and Peru, have already been negotiated but have not yet received congressional approval. Reuters notes that a number of congressional Democrats are prickly about elements of these agreements—most specifically that they do not safeguard U.S. labor rights.
Congress worked this week to narrow partisan differences through what the U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab praised as a “good faith dialogue” (FT). Congressional Democrats on March 28 unveiled a proposal saying they would pass trade deals that include environmental and labor protections and allow trading partners to make generic copies (IHT) of patented U.S. pharmaceuticals. Both labor groups and the Bush administration tacitly praised elements of the proposal.
However refreshing the cooperative effort to pass a deal might be, experts say the backdrop of President Bush losing his trade promotion authority casts an uncertain shadow on the future of U.S. trade negotiations. As this briefing by the Business Roundtable explains, TPA is a critical tool because it bypasses the bureaucratic quagmire of congressional markups and allows the President to present trade agreements to Congress in final form, for a yes-or-no vote. Without this authority, experts say, multilateral deals like the ones targeted by the Doha round of trade negotiations could become practically impossible to pass.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
This report outlines the nature of the challenges in Pakistan's tribal areas, formulates strategies for addressing those challenges, and distills the strategies into realistic policy proposals worthy of consideration by the incoming administration.
This report analyzes the debate over U.S. use of assurances against torture, explaining the contexts in which they are used, how they can be conveyed, and what they can contain, and recommends a number of ways to respond to criticism so that the United States can continue using assurances.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
“The Right Way to Engage China:” Henry M. Paulson argues that the prosperity of the United States and China depends on helping China to further integrate into the global economic system.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
