home > by publication type > daily analysis > Guantanamo: Confessions and Questions
Email
| Prepared by: | Eben Kaplan |
|---|
Military tribunals at Guantanamo began this week with the trial of David Hicks. (AP Photo/Brennan Linsley)
A new chapter in the saga of the Guantanamo Bay detainees opened this March in rather unspectacular fashion. The first trial of an “enemy combatant” before a military commission at the controversial U.S. military base ended almost as soon as it began. David Hicks, an Australian accused of aiding al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, entered a guilty plea (BBC), preempting any lengthy legal proceedings.
Hicks’ trial was supposed to be a test run (AP) for the new military tribunal system established last year. Following a June Supreme Court ruling that the president did not have the authority to form special tribunals for detainees at Guantanamo, Congress passed the Military Commissions Act, granting that authority. Noah Feldman, a legal expert and CFR adjunct fellow, expects more back and forth between Congress and the Supreme Court before the dust settles over the infamous prison camp.
Days before the Hicks trial, several other prominent Guantanamo inmates made their first appearance before a Combatant Status Review Tribunal; a smaller military commission charged with reviewing the detainees’ classification as enemy combatants. Chief among these was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, long believed to be the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. In his boastful testimony (censored transcript, PDF), Mohammed claimed responsibility for 9/11, the murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, and more than two dozen other plots. Mohammed also claimed to be the victim of torture (The Age) before his transfer to Guantanamo in September.
Around the world, many believe that the circumstances of their detention render such confessions useless. Pearl’s family met Mohammed’s confession with some doubts (JPost). Britain’s relatively pro-American Telegraph says “the world will condemn the procedures by which the verdicts were reached.” Washington Post columnist Anne Applebaum writes that Guantanamo’s affront to the rule of law is not only immoral, “it is also ineffective and in fact profoundly counterproductive.”
While Mohammed awaits trial, which could happen in the next year, Hicks will serve his prison sentence in Australia (Australian), becoming one of more than four hundred detainees to leave U.S. custody in Guantanamo. But with roughly 385 detainees remaining, including a few new arrivals, the notorious prison camp appears likely to remain in operation (McClatchy) for some time. Justice for the detainees, says the New York Times, is “a work in progress.”
The New York Times recently reported that upon his arrival as Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates lobbied his fellow cabinet members and the president to close Guantanamo. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice—who frequently gets an earful about Guantanamo when traveling abroad—sided with Gates. But President Bush, who last autumn expressed his desire to close the base, sided with Vice President Dick Cheney and Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, who argued that alternatives to Guantanamo would prove even more troublesome. In an online debate, David B. Rivkin and Karen J. Greenberg, two legal experts, consider the proper way to deal with enemy combatants.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.