home > by publication type > daily analysis > Clearing the Transatlantic Air
Email
| Prepared by: | Lee Hudson Teslik |
|---|
A new agreement could open up new routes for European carriers. (AP/Jupiterimages)
For transatlantic jetsetters, the days when Paris meant Air France and Alitalia carried Americans off on Roman holiday may soon be a thing of past. An “open skies” pact between the United States and European Union, recently agreed upon (IHT) by EU ministers, is set to obliterate long-standing restrictions on Europe’s national airlines. Should U.S. officials sign the deal later this month, as expected, an intense period (Economist) of reshuffling and consolidation among European airlines may result.
One of the most significant (BBC) of the pact’s provisions allows any EU airline to fly from any European city to any U.S. city, and vice versa. Current requirements limit airlines to transatlantic flights from their home country—restricting the bulk of operations for many European airlines to one or two main cities. Analysts say the deal would most benefit (Bloomberg) the major European and American carriers that stand to gain access to London’s Heathrow airport, Europe’s main gateway to the United States. This increased access would, in turn, spike competition for transatlantic air carriers and reduce fares across the board.
The pact could also prompt a flurry of airline mergers. Currently, if one European airline buys another, it risks losing the U.S. landing rights of the company it purchased. Fears about landing rights unraveled (AeroWorld) a proposed 2000 merger between British Airways and the Dutch carrier KLM. Anticipation that these restrictions might be lifted kicked off a wave of merger rumors involving many of Europe’s smaller airlines. One of the first carriers snapped up could be Spain’s Iberia—the U.S. private investment firm Texas Pacific Group is reportedly considering a $4.5 billion bid (Spiegel) for the airline. The Economist says Austrian Airlines, Scandanavia’s SAS, and Poland’s LOT are also logical takeover targets.
This would all be good news for continental European airlines, particularly those without preexisting open-skies arrangements with the United States (sixteen of the twenty-seven EU countries currently have such agreements). But the deal has its enemies. British air carriers, for instance, bristle at possible encroachments (MarketWatch) on Heathrow, their most profitable turf. On the American end, officials refused to lift (EiTB) a regulation forbidding European airlines from owning more than 25 percent of any American air carrier. Critics slammed (WSJ) U.S. legislators for holding out on this issue, and more generally for refusing to agree to a more sweeping program of liberalizations.
Still, grudgingly or not, the deal’s main players are preparing for a limited version of the agreement to go through. Virgin Atlantic—one of two British carriers currently operating full transatlantic service out of Heathrow, and thus one of the airlines with the most to lose from the deal—says it hopes to capitalize by launching operations in several continental European cities. Virgin is also hoping to make inroads on the U.S. market with its new venture, Virgin America. “It’s a good day (BBC) for the traveler,” said Virgin’s chairman Richard Branson. Commendably upbeat, though he didn’t say it was a good day for Virgin.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.