Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Nigeria’s ‘Godfather Syndrome’
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Analysts and ordinary Nigerians say it's powerful businessmen, not the people, who will decide. (AP/George Osodi)
In Nigerian politics, charisma is much less important than an arsenal of thuggish campaign tactics. In the months preceding mid-April’s polls, political candidates have engineered the kidnapping of their opponents, would-be candidates have been assassinated, and thugs have been hired to intimidate rival campaign supporters. Such behavior is business-as-usual in a country run by political “godfathers,” (BBC) or political elites who sponsor candidates with the understanding that they will reap the financial benefits once the candidate takes office. “If anyone tries to attack me, my boys will unleash terror,” a nationally prominent opposition politician told Human Rights Watch.
As expected, Saturday's gubernatorial elections were marred by irregularities (Reuters), leading election observers to say that the vote should be rerun in four to six states. In the oil-rich Niger Delta states, many people were unable to vote and electoral officials were seen stuffing ballot boxes (AP). While the vote was largely peaceful, such widespread vote rigging does not bode well for the April 21 presidential elections.
If successful, this month’s elections will usher in the first transition between democratically elected leaders since Nigeria’s independence in 1960. But given all the preelection and gubernatorial election shenanigans, observers remain skeptical. An editorial in the New York Times urges President Olusegun Obasanjo to allow serious opposition candidates on the presidential ballot. Yet the president appears determined to do just the opposite: He declared this week that April 12 and 13 would be a public holiday, a move that delays a Supreme Court hearing to determine whether a key opposition presidential candidate can run (VOA). “The elections were programmed to fail,” said Jibrin Ibrahim of the Center for Democracy and Development in Nigeria at a March 9 panel at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. “But people will fight to prevent this.”
Leading the fight is Nigeria’s judiciary, which has shown admirable independence from Obasanjo’s administration. It ruled this week that the elections cannot be postponed (Nigerian Tribune), which some had rumored Obasanjo might attempt. Another battle in the courts over the right of Vice President Atiku Abubakar to run for president remains unresolved. The Independent National Electoral Commission has tried to disqualify him, and the issue now hangs in the balance in Nigeria’s Supreme Court. The electoral commission has been widely criticized for its mismanagement of the electoral process, and many fear that its incompetence and politicization will undermine this month’s polls. The strength of Nigeria’s institutions and the flaws of its federalist government structure are examined in a new Backgrounder.
Outside Nigeria, the presidential election’s results may reverberate widely. “Nigeria should be the central African question,” writes Robert I. Rotberg in a new Council Special Report on Nigeria. “No country’s fate is so decisive for the continent.” Oil-rich Nigeria is the continent’s most populous country, and if successful, its return to democracy could serve as a model for other African countries. Already the government has made substantial inroads in tackling corruption, but a growing insurgency (Economist) in the Niger Delta has oil executives, and the governments they supply, nervous.
Reducing conflict in the Niger Delta will be imperative for Nigeria’s new leader. The militant group MEND, profiled in this Backgrounder, has reduced national oil output by at least 25 percent by attacking oil pipelines and kidnapping foreign oil workers. Thus far, the Nigerian government has treated MEND as a security threat, not a political entity to negotiate with, but many experts argue it will have to change strategies to successfully deal with the group. This conference looks at trends in the Niger Delta and how the United States might support the Nigerian government’s effort to improve security in the region.
Presidential candidates (BBC) | ICG report: Nigeria’s Elections
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
This report outlines the nature of the challenges in Pakistan's tribal areas, formulates strategies for addressing those challenges, and distills the strategies into realistic policy proposals worthy of consideration by the incoming administration.
This report analyzes the debate over U.S. use of assurances against torture, explaining the contexts in which they are used, how they can be conveyed, and what they can contain, and recommends a number of ways to respond to criticism so that the United States can continue using assurances.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
“The Right Way to Engage China” Henry M. Paulson argues that the prosperity of the United States and China depends on helping China to further integrate into the global economic system.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
