home > by publication type > daily analysis > Virginia Tech through Foreign Eyes
Email
| Author: | Lionel Beehner |
|---|
South Korean citizens mourn at the U.S. embassy in Seoul for Virginia Tech shooting victims. (AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon)
As they say about America’s economy: When the United States sneezes, the world catches a cold. Thanks to the ubiquitous news media, so it goes these days when tragedy strikes inside America. Reactions to the rampage by a gunman (CNN) at Virginia Tech, which left thirty-two dead, were varied across the globe. Some countries, harkening back to Cold War-era portrayals by Soviet-bloc media of America’s high murder rate, seemed to scold the United States for its tolerance of guns and glamorization of violence. Others, citing the gunman’s South Korean origins, alluded to the sometimes difficult position of minority groups in the United States, be they African, Asian, or otherwise. For its part, South Korea worried that the incident might “taint” its reputation (OhmyNews) among Americans, though others saw this as an overreaction.
Past history appears to matter, too. In countries that have experienced similar school massacres, media have shied away from dumping too much blame on “American society” or its gun laws. After all, notes Der Spiegel, Germany’s strict guns laws did not prevent the 2002 killing of eighteen people at a school in Erfurt. Generally, however, foreign media drew distinctions between isolated incidents like the massacre of sixteen students in Dunblane, Scotland in 1996, and the so-called “gun culture” of the United States, which, as the Guardian put it, “seems collectively unwilling and politically incapable (ChiTrib) of doing anything serious to stop such things happening again.”
Less subtle analysis poured forth from the Middle East. Syria’s state-run daily Tishreen says the tragedy raises questions about the power of the pro-gun lobby and also questions the effectiveness of the Department of Homeland Security at monitoring its homegrown criminals (Middle East Times). Qatar’s Al Watan said the “might-makes-right” culture that permeates the United States was to blame for the shootings. The same logic—using force to solve problems—is what drove the United States into Iraq, the paper concludes.
There was a sense of incongruity, too, in the wall-to-wall coverage of “America in Mourning” on the U.S. television networks. As Middle East expert Juan Cole wrote on his blog, “The profound sorrow and alarm produced in the American public by the horrific shootings at Virginia Tech should give us a baseline for what the Iraqis are actually living through. They have two Virginia Tech-style attacks every single day.”
Still, much like the aftermath of 9/11, there was an outpouring of sympathy, at least at the official level. Even Iran sent its condolences. "We haven't seen this kind of sympathy and support since Hurricane Katrina and 9/11," said Edgar Vasquez, a State Department spokesman.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.