Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Virginia Tech through Foreign Eyes
| Author: | Lionel Beehner |
|---|
South Korean citizens mourn at the U.S. embassy in Seoul for Virginia Tech shooting victims. (AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon)
As they say about America’s economy: When the United States sneezes, the world catches a cold. Thanks to the ubiquitous news media, so it goes these days when tragedy strikes inside America. Reactions to the rampage by a gunman (CNN) at Virginia Tech, which left thirty-two dead, were varied across the globe. Some countries, harkening back to Cold War-era portrayals by Soviet-bloc media of America’s high murder rate, seemed to scold the United States for its tolerance of guns and glamorization of violence. Others, citing the gunman’s South Korean origins, alluded to the sometimes difficult position of minority groups in the United States, be they African, Asian, or otherwise. For its part, South Korea worried that the incident might “taint” its reputation (OhmyNews) among Americans, though others saw this as an overreaction.
Past history appears to matter, too. In countries that have experienced similar school massacres, media have shied away from dumping too much blame on “American society” or its gun laws. After all, notes Der Spiegel, Germany’s strict guns laws did not prevent the 2002 killing of eighteen people at a school in Erfurt. Generally, however, foreign media drew distinctions between isolated incidents like the massacre of sixteen students in Dunblane, Scotland in 1996, and the so-called “gun culture” of the United States, which, as the Guardian put it, “seems collectively unwilling and politically incapable (ChiTrib) of doing anything serious to stop such things happening again.”
Less subtle analysis poured forth from the Middle East. Syria’s state-run daily Tishreen says the tragedy raises questions about the power of the pro-gun lobby and also questions the effectiveness of the Department of Homeland Security at monitoring its homegrown criminals (Middle East Times). Qatar’s Al Watan said the “might-makes-right” culture that permeates the United States was to blame for the shootings. The same logic—using force to solve problems—is what drove the United States into Iraq, the paper concludes.
There was a sense of incongruity, too, in the wall-to-wall coverage of “America in Mourning” on the U.S. television networks. As Middle East expert Juan Cole wrote on his blog, “The profound sorrow and alarm produced in the American public by the horrific shootings at Virginia Tech should give us a baseline for what the Iraqis are actually living through. They have two Virginia Tech-style attacks every single day.”
Still, much like the aftermath of 9/11, there was an outpouring of sympathy, at least at the official level. Even Iran sent its condolences. "We haven't seen this kind of sympathy and support since Hurricane Katrina and 9/11," said Edgar Vasquez, a State Department spokesman.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Expert Conversations on World Events
In The Closing of the American Border, Edward Alden goes behind the scenes to tell the story of the Bush administration’s struggle to balance security and openness in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
“ The Logic of Zero:” Ivo Daalder and Jan Lodal say Washington must lead the way to a world without nuclear weapons. The first step will be dramatically limiting the U.S. nuclear arsenal's declared size and purpose.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
