Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > The World Bank Blues
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Wolfowitz acknowledged that he helped a close female friend get a promotion. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
The scandal bogging down the World Bank is tawdry and eye-catching, the stuff of high political theater. Paul Wolfowitz, the Bank’s president, admits he made a “mistake” (IHT) by giving a promotion and hefty pay raise to his “companion” or “girlfriend” or “partner”—the media has yet to decide how precisely to identify her (Slate). Still, the specifics of the pay-raise scandal pale in importance to the underlying tug-of-war the incident has brought into focus, one which goes to the heart of how the Bank operates and the role it plays in the world.
With geopolitical trends sapping its power, the World Bank finds itself at an uncomfortable crossroads. CFR Senior Fellow Sebastian Mallaby argues in a recent Washington Post op-ed that this has been the case particularly since 9/11, after which Western countries tightened their purse strings on development aid. As a consequence, Mallaby says, the United States and Europe lost political clout in the developing world. This trend is perhaps most notable in Africa, where China has increasingly become the sugar daddy of choice, while simultaneously pushing to expand its African oil interests.
Historically, the World Bank stepped in at similar moments to lobby for aid increases. But with the Bank’s mandate muddled—in part, some say, due to the ambiguous agenda put forth by Wolfowitz—the institution has struggled to maintain its role as a moral cheerleader. Jessica Einhorn, a former managing director at the Bank, argues in a 2006 Foreign Affairs article that blame for the Bank’s waning relevance lies partly with its outdated financial structure, which lends too much money to middle-income countries.
The Wolfowitz scandal, which burst into the public eye last month, only strained these tensions, and worked to spiral the Bank into something of a civil war (Guardian). Several senior Bank officials called for Wolfowitz to resign, and a statement from the Bank’s Independent Evaluation Group, leaked to the Financial Times, offers a searing assessment, saying the Bank’s operations are being “jeopardized by serious governance problems” and a “crisis in leadership.”
Discontent over Wolfowitz stems at least in part from anger at the man who tapped him to head the Bank in 2005, President George W. Bush. Even back when Wolfowitz was first appointed, some Bank employees took the news of their new president with more than a touch of trepidation. He was perceived as a neoconservative Bush crony (NYT) at a time when unilateralism and American bluster were already wearing thin. Wolfowitz partially eased these concerns by making gestures to boost U.S. aid to Africa (BBC) in the face of Bush administration disagreement. But relations between Wolfowitz and his charges soon festered, particularly as he launched an aggressive anti-corruption campaign that some Bank officials said would cripple efforts to relieve developing world debt (NPR).
It would be easy to pawn off all the Bank’s troubles on Wolfowitz, but it would also oversimplify the matter. The Economist says the Bank’s board bears at least as much responsibility for a wayward agenda as Wolfowitz himself, particularly for the kinds of generic institutional backwardness that plagued the Bank well before Wolfowitz arrived at its helm. Still, the same article urges Wolfowitz to resign, voluntarily, so as to end the current quagmire and allow the bank to guarantee “that the real losers from the Wolfowitz debacle are not the world’s poor.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In The Closing of the American Border, Edward Alden goes behind the scenes to tell the story of the Bush administration’s struggle to balance security and openness in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
In this report, Bruce W. MacDonald illuminates the strategic landscape of military space competition between the United States and China and highlights the dangers and opportunities the United States confronts in space.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
“ The Latter-Day Sultan:” Akbar Ganji says that blaming Iran's problems on President Ahmadinejad inaccurately suggests that Iran's problems will go away when Ahmadinejad does.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
