Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Iran Coming to the Table
| Prepared by: | Lionel Beehner |
|---|
Iranian negotiator Ali Larijani was told Europe may not require Iran's complete nuclear dismantling. (AP Photo/Hans Punz)
With Iran finally agreeing to attend a security conference on Iraq (NYT), negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program may also move forward with reports that key European states are mulling a new diplomatic approach. EU officials appear to have softened their stance (al-Jazeera) and may allow Iran to keep its existing centrifuges and agree to a suspension of further UN sanctions if Iran agrees to a moratorium on future production. In other words—as the European Union’s foreign policy chief Javier Solana recently told Iranian negotiator Ali Larijani—Europe would not demand the complete dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program as a prerequisite to negotiations. Larijani did not provide many details about the meeting but sounded optimistic (IRNA). Even some U.S. officials say they might entertain (AP) such an offer, though the State Department denies it would allow Iran to retain any homegrown enrichment capacity.
President Bush, in an April 24 interview with Charlie Rose, did not rule out direct negotiations with the Iranians—but said the United States sought talks only on the issue of Iraqi security, not on Tehran’s nuclear program. Iran says it will send its foreign minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, to Egypt later this week for the second round of multilateral talks on Iraq. Tehran says it feels rebuffed on a number of fronts. Last month’s meeting in Baghdad marked the first time in a few years Iranian diplomats sat across the table from their U.S. counterparts. But the Iranians claim they had no say (WashPost) on the location and agenda of the meeting. They also said Iraqi officials reneged on a promise to release five Iranian operatives seized by U.S. forces in Iraq. Hence, Iran says it will not send Mottaki to Egypt for the follow-up meeting. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari have urged Iran to reconsider.
Tensions between Tehran and Washington have escalated over the past few months, given the deployment of a U.S. carrier strike group in the Gulf, the detentions in northern Iraq, and UN sanctions. Secretary Rice, in an interview with the Financial Times, called it a “rebalancing” of the relationship and said “in the private sector people are making assessments of the reputational and investment risk associated with Iran.” The Iranian business community has taken notice of the change. In this interview with CFR.org, Abbas Bolurfrushan, former President of the Iranian Business Council in Dubai, says if “the grip is tightened, the economic effect will force more Iranians to get out of the country and do their business someplace else.” A growing percentage of the overall population may also be turning against (PDF) the government’s nuclear program, writes Karim Sadjadpour of the Carnegie Endowment in the Washington Quarterly. Most Iranian businessmen hope for a normalization of U.S.-Iranian relations, outlined in this CFR timeline, and for sanctions to be lifted.
There are competing views on how best to accomplish this goal, which has eluded diplomats for nearly three decades. Dennis Ross of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy calls for sticks, not carrots. “In the classic terms of statecraft, the sticks need to be potent enough to concentrate the minds of Iranian leaders on what they have to lose,” he writes in the New Republic. But Laura Secor, an editorial page editor at the New York Times, suggests the “do-nothing” approach to behavior change—that is, allow reform to come from within, not from outside pressure. “This is an epic struggle, invested with no small measure of heroism,” she writes in the New Republic (subscription required). “But that struggle and the associated heroics are not ours. They belong to the Iranians.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Expert Conversations on World Events
In The Closing of the American Border, Edward Alden goes behind the scenes to tell the story of the Bush administration’s struggle to balance security and openness in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
“ The Logic of Zero:” Ivo Daalder and Jan Lodal say Washington must lead the way to a world without nuclear weapons. The first step will be dramatically limiting the U.S. nuclear arsenal's declared size and purpose.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
