home > by publication type > daily analysis > Iran Coming to the Table
Email
| Prepared by: | Lionel Beehner |
|---|
Iranian negotiator Ali Larijani was told Europe may not require Iran's complete nuclear dismantling. (AP Photo/Hans Punz)
With Iran finally agreeing to attend a security conference on Iraq (NYT), negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program may also move forward with reports that key European states are mulling a new diplomatic approach. EU officials appear to have softened their stance (al-Jazeera) and may allow Iran to keep its existing centrifuges and agree to a suspension of further UN sanctions if Iran agrees to a moratorium on future production. In other words—as the European Union’s foreign policy chief Javier Solana recently told Iranian negotiator Ali Larijani—Europe would not demand the complete dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program as a prerequisite to negotiations. Larijani did not provide many details about the meeting but sounded optimistic (IRNA). Even some U.S. officials say they might entertain (AP) such an offer, though the State Department denies it would allow Iran to retain any homegrown enrichment capacity.
President Bush, in an April 24 interview with Charlie Rose, did not rule out direct negotiations with the Iranians—but said the United States sought talks only on the issue of Iraqi security, not on Tehran’s nuclear program. Iran says it will send its foreign minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, to Egypt later this week for the second round of multilateral talks on Iraq. Tehran says it feels rebuffed on a number of fronts. Last month’s meeting in Baghdad marked the first time in a few years Iranian diplomats sat across the table from their U.S. counterparts. But the Iranians claim they had no say (WashPost) on the location and agenda of the meeting. They also said Iraqi officials reneged on a promise to release five Iranian operatives seized by U.S. forces in Iraq. Hence, Iran says it will not send Mottaki to Egypt for the follow-up meeting. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari have urged Iran to reconsider.
Tensions between Tehran and Washington have escalated over the past few months, given the deployment of a U.S. carrier strike group in the Gulf, the detentions in northern Iraq, and UN sanctions. Secretary Rice, in an interview with the Financial Times, called it a “rebalancing” of the relationship and said “in the private sector people are making assessments of the reputational and investment risk associated with Iran.” The Iranian business community has taken notice of the change. In this interview with CFR.org, Abbas Bolurfrushan, former President of the Iranian Business Council in Dubai, says if “the grip is tightened, the economic effect will force more Iranians to get out of the country and do their business someplace else.” A growing percentage of the overall population may also be turning against (PDF) the government’s nuclear program, writes Karim Sadjadpour of the Carnegie Endowment in the Washington Quarterly. Most Iranian businessmen hope for a normalization of U.S.-Iranian relations, outlined in this CFR timeline, and for sanctions to be lifted.
There are competing views on how best to accomplish this goal, which has eluded diplomats for nearly three decades. Dennis Ross of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy calls for sticks, not carrots. “In the classic terms of statecraft, the sticks need to be potent enough to concentrate the minds of Iranian leaders on what they have to lose,” he writes in the New Republic. But Laura Secor, an editorial page editor at the New York Times, suggests the “do-nothing” approach to behavior change—that is, allow reform to come from within, not from outside pressure. “This is an epic struggle, invested with no small measure of heroism,” she writes in the New Republic (subscription required). “But that struggle and the associated heroics are not ours. They belong to the Iranians.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.