Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Wary Neighbors Meet on Iraq
| Prepared by: | Lionel Beehner |
|---|
Secretary Rice with British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett in Sharm El-Sheik. (AP Image/Emilio Morenatti)
Top officials from around sixty countries, including the United States and Iran, met in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, for a two-day conference to tackle issues of security and power sharing in Iraq (BBC). The meeting marked the second go-around of regional talks aimed at breaking Iraq’s political stalemate, forgiving Iraqi debt, and reaching a settlement on a security plan (RFE/RL) amenable to Iraq’s neighbors, both Sunni and Shiite.
U.S. and Iranian officials at the expert level met briefly on the sidelines of the conference but reportedly only discussed Iraq (NYT). A highly anticipated one-on-one meeting between Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki never materialized (AP), although the two exchanged brief pleasantries at lunch on Thursday. Mottaki, in a statement, accused the United States of creating a “safe haven” (al-Jazeera) for terrorists capable of attacking Iraq's neighbors and refusing to release five Iranian diplomats seized in northern Iraq. But as Rice told reporters, “This is not about the United States and Iran. It's about Iraq.” On that note, Rice did meet with her Syrian counterpart, the first such high-level meeting between Syria and the United States in two years (NYT), but mainly to discuss the flow of foreign fighters across the Syrian border into Iraq.
The U.S. agreement to participate in a regional conference on Iraq with countries like Iran, as suggested by the bipartisan Iraq Study Group, may demonstrate a gradual shift in the White House’s Middle East policy. “The administration has been reluctant since day one to share responsibilities and [sought] to control all developments in Iraq involving third countries,” CFR Senior Fellow Steven Simon told CFR.org’s Bernard Gwertzman in a recent interview. As this CFR.org Timeline highlights, the last time high-level U.S. and Iranian diplomats met was at the same resort in 2004 when nothing of substance emerged. Trita Parsi of the National Iranian-American Council welcomes direct U.S.-Iranian talks but admits in this CFR.org podcast that Tehran has “no silver bullet” to solve Iraq's security problems. Were the United States to engage in direct talks with Iran, writes CFR's Ray Takeyh in the Boston Globe, Rice would need to “explicitly take the use of force off the table.”
Topping the conference's agenda, however, is whether Saudi Arabia and Iran can control fighters they allegedly support in Iraq who are responsible for the bulk of the country’s violence. The Saudis want to ensure that Iraq does not become a puppet state of Tehran, whereby greater Iranian influence on the Arabian Peninsula could unsettle Saudi Arabia’s own Shiite minorities. Iran, which fought an eight-year war with Saddam’s forces in the 1980s, seeks guarantees that Iraq’s Sunni minorities never reach power and pose another military threat. The trouble, writes Kamran Bokhari of the intelligence analysis website Stratfor, is that “Iraq’s Sunni and Shiite communities are so internally factionalized that neither Tehran nor Riyadh is likely to succeed in shutting down the militancy.”
Some progress has been made on Iraq's security front, writes Hoshyar Zebari, Iraq's foreign minister, in the Washington Post. “In Anbar province,” he says, “Sunni sheikhs and insurgents have turned against al-Qaeda and to the side of Iraqi security forces. This would have been unthinkable even six months ago.” This CFR Backgrounder examines reports of the splintering of insurgent groups like al-Qaeda in Iraq.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
