Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Wolfowitz Leaves Bank Under Cloud
| Prepared by: | Lee Hudson Teslik |
|---|
Wolfowitz agreed to leave for the good of the Bank. (AP Images/J. Scott Applewhite)
World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz will step down June 30, ending a drawn-out dispute that cast a cloud over the Bank’s governance agenda. The Washington Post said Wolfowitz agreed to leave after it was clear he faced reprimand or dismissal by the Bank’s board over charges he provided a promotion and pay-raise to his girlfriend, a Bank employee. After protracted negotiations, Wolfowitz won acknowledgement from the Bank that he acted “ethically and in good faith,” saying he was resigning for the good of the institution. A board statement said “a number of mistakes were made by a number of individuals in handling the matter” and a review of the Bank’s governance procedures was necessary.
Wolfowitz’s departure won’t necessarily end the World Bank’s woes. First there is the issue of picking a successor. Washington currently bears responsibility for this process, though European leaders say they are keen to change this dynamic (FT). Any candidate too close to President Bush could be a political non-starter. Der Spiegel suggests three possible candidates: Paul Volcker, the former U.S. Federal Reserve chairman; Tony Blair, Britain’s outgoing prime minister; and Stanley Fischer, the governor of the Bank of Israel. The Wall Street Journal cautions that the selection process could be contentious and argues a highly publicized dogfight could further weaken the Bank’s standing in the world.
A slew of policy questions also remain unanswered. One primary concern is whether a new president would choose to maintain Wolfowitz’s emphasis on the bank’s anticorruption campaign—the credibility of which, many experts believe, suffered dramatically over the course of the present scandal. More fundamentally, a successor will have to navigate uncomfortable questions of the Bank’s relevance in an era where private equity is increasingly targeting the developing world (HBS).
For Wolfowitz’s political career, however, this may be the end of the line. With popular resentment of the Iraq war already prevalent, his 2005 appointment as World Bank president, in the face of staunch opposition, was essentially a second chance to make good. But for a variety of reasons, some of which were undoubtedly beyond his control, Wolfowitz’s presidency never took flight.
Many trace Wolfowitz’s problems to his previous incarnation as the architect of President Bush’s strategy to “democratize” the Middle East, beginning with Iraq (New Yorker). Despite early efforts to boost aid to Africa (BBC) in the face of Bush administration objections, lingering resentment about Iraq undermined Wolfowitz’s efforts win the support of many at the Bank. He also drew heavy criticism for his anticorruption push, which many analysts say undermined bank efforts at debt relief (NPR). Now, with questions turning to Wolfowitz’s legacy, supportive words are few and far between. In a podcast, CFR’s Sebastian Mallaby says Wolfowitz “was deemed to be a pretty bad manager from the start,” and “dug himself in further” through indecisiveness and stubborn loyalty to Bush administration insiders, all of which came at the Bank’s expense. For Wolfowitz, who spoke at CFR ahead of the Iraq war in 2003, the World Bank job in many ways represented a chance for political redemption (NYT). Whether he’ll get another such opportunity remains to be seen.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
