Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > by date > Spinning Iran’s Centrifuges
| Prepared by: | Lionel Beehner |
|---|
Iran's nuclear enrichment facility in Natanz. Iran is reportedly making progress with its nuclear program. (AP Photo/Hasan Sarbakhshian)
Iran is making progress with its nuclear program, according to the latest report (PDF) by the International Atomic Energy Agency. After short-notice inspections (AP) at Natanz revealed that Iranian engineers were operating 1,300 centrifuges and producing reactor-ready fuel, nuclear experts now predict the Islamic Republic could have as many as three thousand centrifuges installed by midsummer. Once operational, these would be enough to produce fissile material for one nuclear weapon per year. The Iranians previously had technical difficulties spinning the centrifuges at the speeds needed to produce nuclear fuel, but they appear to have solved this obstacle (BBC) and developed “knowledge about how to enrich.” Although Tehran maintains its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, Western governments accuse it of seeking the capability to build a nuclear weapon.
The latest developments may alter Western diplomats’ timetables. “The worst-case estimate,” writes Ephraim Asculai, a senior research fellow at the Institute for Science and International Security, in the Canada Free Press, “is that Iran could have a sufficient quantity of HEU [highly enriched uranium] for a nuclear weapon as early as 2008 or 2009.” Yet some American and Israeli experts suggest Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the IAEA, may have overstated Iran’s nuclear progress to avert further sanctions (Haaretz) from being imposed. Regardless, Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs R. Nicholas Burns, in an interview with the New York Times, envisions a “third set of [UN Security Council] sanctions.” EU and Iranian negotiators will meet on May 31 to discuss the matters (U.S. and Iranian diplomats meet May 27 in Baghdad but the talks will be confined to Iraqi security issues).
Washington demands suspension of Tehran’s enrichment program as a precursor to any direct talks on the nuclear program. “Otherwise…they can simply run out the clock and continue to play a waiting game,” says Tom Casey, a State Department spokesman. But some experts say that given the new facts on the ground and the level of know-how and nuclear progress the Iranians have achieved, a temporary suspension may no longer make sense. “Suspension has been a futile effort,” says CFR’s Charles Ferguson in this new podcast. “It means we would buy some time but does not necessarily mean it would prevent Iran from further mastery.” Or, as ElBaradei told reporters, “From now on, it is simply a question of perfecting that knowledge. People will not like to hear it, but that’s a fact.” Hence, some Western diplomats say they should focus more now on preventing Iran from opting out of legal frameworks like the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
This interactive CFR timeline looks at U.S.-Iranian relations, while this Backgrounder examine U.S. intelligence on Iran’s nuclear program. Robert Litwak of the Wilson Center and Michael Rubin of the American Enterprise Institute debate the merits of regime change in Tehran in an online debate.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
