home > by publication type > interviews > Lindsay: Bush Seeks to ‘Reach Out’ to Bolster Support on Iraq
Email
| Interviewee: | James A. Lindsay, Director, Robert S. Strauss Center, University of Texas |
|---|---|
| Interviewer: | Bernard Gwertzman, Consulting Editor |
May 22, 2007
James M. Lindsay, a former CFR director of studies, says President Bush is so politically weakened by Iraq that he has begun to “reach out” to others to broaden his base of support. He says the days when the administration could act unilaterally are over, “and the administration is being forced by necessity, not by choice, to try to find areas where it can work with other people.” Lindsay says “now that the political bleeding of the president has continued, the White House has been forced to make concessions on a number of different issues.”
President Bush has about twenty months left in office, and he’s struggling with Congress on what to do about Iraq. It’s a very complicated issue. The Washington Post says Bush seems to be now leaning toward accepting some of the recommendations in the Iraq Study Group report the White House dismissed last year. Where do you think he can go in these last months?
President Bush has been gravely weakened by the course of events in Iraq. It has come to dominate the day-to-day agenda; it has cost him political support. It has put him in a position in which much of his administration’s effort is going toward fighting off or holding off Democratic criticisms, and that is likely to be the overarching motif of his remaining time in office. That’s not to say the president’s powerless. The office of the presidency comes with a tremendous ability to set the agenda and take initiatives, particularly in the area of foreign affairs.
I notice he has the NATO secretary general out at his ranch in Texas today. He seems to be seeking support from everywhere right now. Do you see a kind of conversion by Bush in his last months?
Because the president is politically weakened, he has to reach out to more people and more quarters to find allies. And if you were to go back four years, in the aftermath of what was perceived at the time to be a great success in Iraq, the administration set the agenda and pushed other people out of the way. Those days are now over, and the administration is being forced by necessity, not by choice, to try to find areas where it can work with other people. We’ve seen that change initially in the rhetoric at the start of the second term, a kinder gentler version of itself. But now that the political bleeding of the president has continued, the White House has been forced to make concessions on a number of different issues. And he’s likely to remain in that position over the last twenty months.
Coming back to the Iraq Study Group, which put great emphasis on multifaceted diplomacy with Iran and with Syria, working to solve the Israeli-Palestinian issues, and looking toward setting good-governance benchmarks for the Iraqis. The Post said Bush seems now to be adopting some of these recommendations. Is this part of seeking out more support?
Part of it is a matter of perspective. The president went in a very different direction on Iraq than the Iraq Study Group recommended. The administration pushed for the “surge,” which was not what the Baker-Hamilton group recommended. We’re likely to have the surge go forward, but it’s been made pretty clear to the White House by Congressional Republicans that support on Capitol Hill for the surge from Republicans is frail, and likely to erode rapidly if we don’t see a major change in the security situation in Iraq by early fall. That warning from Congressional Republican leaders has a way of concentrating the administration’s attention on the issue, forcing the administration to try to find areas in which it can be seen as being responsive to criticism, and as being open to change. It is trying to find a new strategy. But whether troop levels are going up or down, the administration is still on the unpopular side of the debate, in favor of the “surge.”
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
In this report, CFR Fellow Brad W. Setser recommends addressing the U.S. current account deficit in order to strengthen the United States’ position abroad.
This report, written by CFR Senior Fellow Daniel Markey, outlines the nature of the challenges in Pakistan's tribal areas, formulates strategies for addressing those challenges, and distills the strategies into realistic policy proposals worthy of consideration by the incoming administration.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
“The Next President:” Richard Holbrooke says the next U.S. president will inherit a more difficult set of international challenges than any predecessor since World War II.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
