home > by publication type > daily analysis > Sorting Fact from Violence in Iraq
Email
| Prepared by: | Lionel Beehner |
|---|
A watchtower of the Shiite shrine in Samarra after the June 13 bombing. (AP Images/Hameed Rasheed)
The key to understanding progress in Iraq may be in the metrics. U.S. troops are expected to hit their high point at the end of June. Current numbers stand at around 150,000, according to the Brookings Institution’s Iraq Index, the highest levels since May 2003. Moreover, Iraqi security forces are just shy of 350,000, a threefold increase from their May 2004 levels.
Yet the violence, sectarian or otherwise, has only worsened, particularly outside the capital, according to a new report by the Pentagon (WashPost). Insurgents recently blew up (ABC) the minarets on an important Shiite shrine in Samarra, the site of a February 2006 bombing that marked a major turning point in the war. Iraqi civilians are still dying at a rate of around one hundred per day. May was one of the war’s most deadly months for U.S. forces, and monthly attacks by insurgents are now well over four thousand. Meanwhile, the Iraqi government appears as divided as ever and looks likely not to meet many of the political “benchmarks” set by U.S. lawmakers (NYT).
Iraq's foreign minister, Hoshyar Zebari, sees reason for optimism. Speaking at CFR's New York headquarters on June 15, 2007, he argued that, in spite of neighbors who wish his government ill, the “surge” shows signs of working. Indeed, U.S. military officers can cite progress in Anbar province, Iraq's wild west, where violence has receded in recent months. As reported in the New York Times, the U.S. military has also undertaken a risky plan to arm Sunni factions with ammunition and cash to exploit a growing wedge between homegrown ex-Baathists and foreign Islamists. In exchange, the Sunnis have agreed to furnish U.S. officers with intelligence (i.e. the locations of roadside bombs).
Some military analysts question the efficacy of the so-called “Anbar model” strategy. First, it runs the risk of arming one side in a potential civil war. Some analysts, including Brian Katulis of the Center for American Progress, say there’s a similar danger in the U.S. military’s “standing up” of Iraq’s predominantly Shiite security forces. Second, this strategy risks further alienation of the Shiite government in Baghdad at a time when U.S. lawmakers are clamoring that political benchmarks be met. Finally, the U.S. military may be arming the enemy. U.S. tacticians are counting on a widening rift between local Sunnis and foreign jihadis, but it remains difficult in Iraq to determine who is the enemy and who is a collaborator without biometric data, as this Backgrounder suggests. Plus, previous U.S. efforts to reach out to insurgent leaders produced scant progress.
John F. Burns of the New York Times calls the U.S. plan to arm Sunni insurgents an “act of desperation,” a strategy employed with varying results in previous insurgencies in Algeria, Malaya, and Vietnam. Yet CFR’s Stephen Biddle applauds the gambit to pressure the various political factions in Iraq with a mixture of sticks and promises. “If the Shiite-Kurd alliance refuses to compromise, they must be threatened with abandonment or even U.S. assistance to their Sunni rivals,” he wrote last year in the International Herald Tribune. Conversely, if the Sunnis refuse to compromise, “they must be threatened with full U.S. support for a homogeneous Shiite-Kurd army.”
Many experts argue that Iraqi politics increasingly is migrating to the local level, that what happens inside Iraq's Green Zone matters less. CFR's President Emeritus Leslie Gelb disputes the notion that there is no capacity at the local level for a federalized system of government in Iraq. “That's correct if you're talking about who is going to be the mayor of a town,” he tells the Asia Society, “but if you're talking about who is going to run a regional government, the Kurds have already demonstrated they're quite capable of doing it.”
U.S. officials are beginning to ratchet down their expectations and now realize that national reconciliation, at least in the near term, may be unattainable. As such, the U.S. military's longer-term strategy now seems to mirror a much-discussed option from a 2006 Pentagon report: the so-called “go long” approach. As reported in the Washington Post, military officials expect that following a major drawdown of U.S. forces by the middle of next year, a “post-occupation” troop presence that includes roughly ten thousand advisers may need to remain indefinitely in Iraq. This new Backgrounder examines what effects the extended tours of duty have had on U.S. troop morale.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
This report outlines the nature of the challenges in Pakistan's tribal areas, formulates strategies for addressing those challenges, and distills the strategies into realistic policy proposals worthy of consideration by the incoming administration.
This report analyzes the debate over U.S. use of assurances against torture, explaining the contexts in which they are used, how they can be conveyed, and what they can contain, and recommends a number of ways to respond to criticism so that the United States can continue using assurances.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
“The Right Way to Engage China:” Henry M. Paulson argues that the prosperity of the United States and China depends on helping China to further integrate into the global economic system.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
