home > by publication type > daily analysis > Vying for Peace in Sudan
Email
| Prepared by: | Stephanie Hanson |
|---|
The UN and AU face the challenge of addressing rebel groups in Darfur. (AP Images/Alfred de Montesquiou)
After much diplomatic wrangling and months of stalling by Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir, Khartoum has agreed to the deployment of a joint United Nations/African Union peacekeeping force in its western Darfur region. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called Sudan’s acceptance “a milestone development” (Reuters), but the agreement was greeted with widespread skepticism. “Rather than cheer, Darfur watchers mostly reacted with a yawn,” said a Los Angeles Times editorial.
The agreement, a revision of the three-phase plan Bashir accepted in November 2006, calls for overall command of the force by the United Nations and daily operational command by the African Union. Priority will be given to African peacekeepers, but non-Africans will be included (in a proportion that is yet to be determined). Logistical constraints mean the force, expected to be roughly twenty thousand troops, will not be deployed until next year. In the meantime, the security situation in Darfur remains dire, and some, including Sudan expert Eric Reeves, say the scope of the humanitarian emergency is underreported. This Crisis Guide illustrates the history of the conflict in Darfur and the international response.
As the world waits to see if the latest agreement is real, experts caution that a hybrid force—the fixation of international efforts for nearly a year—is not a solution. They say only a sustained and strong diplomatic push to advance peace negotiations between the Sudanese government and Darfur’s rebels can stabilize Darfur. The May 2006 Darfur Peace Agreement, which was only signed by one of Darfur’s rebel groups, has failed to bring security to the area, and in its aftermath the rebels have splintered into a dozen groups. Attempts to revive the long-neglected peace process have floundered, and there is little consensus on how to move forward.
A joint UN/AU effort, led by Special Envoy Jan Eliasson and AU Envoy Salim Ahmed Salim, appears to be the best chance for progress (AP). Yet other actors—including Eritrea, Libya, and Egypt—are pursuing their own initiatives, and UN and AU officials face the challenge of aligning these groups and their divergent goals. Once there is a unified peace effort, the rebel movements will need to be brought to a common position. This is possible, according to an International Crisis Group report, but experts say it could take many months.
The fragile peace between North and South Sudan further complicates the landscape for negotiation. The Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) allows for national power-sharing and calls for national elections in 2009, but the SPLM, South Sudan’s rebel movement turned political party, worries that Darfur peace negotiations might necessitate reopening the CPA. In an interview with CFR.org, Sudan’s U.S. ambassador and former SPLM member, John Ukec Lueth Ukec, said such a move would be a “disaster.” But there are signs Darfur’s rebels want to revisit the CPA. “The SPLM must stop treating the CPA as an untouchable sacred cow,” writes Dr. Abdullahi Osman El-Tom, a Darfur rebel involved with the peace process, in the Sudan Tribune. The two peace processes are inextricably linked, writes Lee J. M. Seymour of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, and the international focus on Darfur should be corrected to account for the instability in South Sudan.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.