Home |
Site Index |
FAQs |
Contact |
RSS
|
Podcast
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Seeking Traction, Democrats Turn to Energy
Email
| Prepared by: |
|---|
The United States is stalling on fuel efficiency standards. (AP Images)
The new Democratic majority in Congress began its tenure pushing an ambitious agenda including everything from immigration to climate change to pulling out of Iraq. But, as the New York Times noted recently, “Congressional Democrats headed home for their Memorial Day recess with only a few signature accomplishments on the domestic front.” More notable so far are the retreats. Democrats backed off (CNN) an attempt to force a timetable for Iraq troop withdrawal, and failed to pass (ChiTrib) a controversial bill on immigration.
With much fanfare, Democrats now turn to energy security. The Senate debate on the bill, experts say, offers little hope for sweeping change. The bill managed to pass (CQ) the Senate with an increase in fuel efficiency standards for automobiles. In an interview with CFR.org, Bryan K. Mignone, a Brookings Institution scholar, wondered how Congress can pass politically difficult measures such as a cap-and-trade program for greenhouse gas emissions if it has such trouble passing a relatively modest increase. The target—thirty-five miles a gallon—is below standards already in place in Europe, Japan (PBS), and China (AP).
The Economist notes that American fuel efficiency regulations, which were somewhat tough in the 1970s and 1980s, “have lost their bite.” Democrats and environmental groups want new fuel economy rules (mp3), also known as Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, which they believe would help reduce dependence on oil imports. But some lawmakers, both Republican and Democrat, favor the auto industry, which contends that new CAFE standards would hurt business. Carmakers are pushing for “more realistic time frames.” They are enthusiastic, however, about provisions in the bill promoting greater use of biofuels such as ethanol (NPR).
More politically sensitive legislation on a cap-and-trade program is being crafted by Democrats in both chambers. Elliot Diringer of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change told CFR.org that he believes such a measure has a chance of passing in this Congress. But an editorial in the Sacramento Bee argues that the legislation will face an uphill battle. As this Backgrounder points out, the Bush administration and many Republican lawmakers fear an emissions cap would also harm American competitiveness.
Some experts, as the Economist has noted, believe that a carbon tax may be an even better model. Emissions trading schemes have a “mixed track record abroad.” (SFChron) But Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) points out a fact of American political life. “I fall into the cap and trade thing,” she said, “largely because I don’t see a carbon tax ever getting enacted in the United States.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at the Council.
After two decades of liberalization, many countries around the world are adopting new restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) that could retard continued progress. The authors make recommendations for correcting this protectionist drift by proposing guidelines for how countries can better regulate FDI yet still reap its economic benefits.
In this Council Special Report, the authors make a strong case that the Bush administration’s policy of diplomatic isolation of Syria is not serving U.S. interests, and offer informed history and thoughtful analysis of the country and its external behavior.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1-800-537-5487, fax +1-410-516-6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1-212-434-9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the logo below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
