home > by publication type > daily analysis > A Tough Month for Trade
Email
| Prepared by: | Lee Hudson Teslik |
|---|
A soybean shipment en route from Brazil to Europe. Agricultural subsidies could doom a Doha deal. (AP Images/Mauricio Piffer)
Last-ditch talks in Potsdam, Germany, seemed perhaps the final hope for squeezing some sort of watered-down deal out of the Doha round of multilateral trade negotiations. With those talks now collapsed (Bloomberg), and President Bush’s fast-track trade promotion authority set to expire June 30, the Doha round and its history of false starts may finally be on its deathbed. But a number of experts, including some adamant free-trade hawks, now argue Doha’s passing might not be such a bad thing.
The five-year negotiations accomplished a fair amount, if not a final deal, argues CFR Senior Fellow Jagdish N. Bhagwati in a recent interview. The very fact that this week’s negotiations took place between a whittled down group of four delegates—the United States, the European Union, India, and Brazil—and not the thirty-some parties initially involved, testifies to this point. “We were cleaning out all peripheral things,” Bhagwati says. “Now it’s a game between four major groups.” That game failed to secure a deal, of course, and the longtime sticking points of agricultural subsidies and barriers to market access remain profound obstacles, but Bhagwati says the fact that talks focused around these core issues is itself an accomplishment.
More daunting, perhaps, is the possible expiration of Bush’s trade promotion authority (TPA). The so-called fast-track authority grants the president power to negotiate trade deals independently, then present them to Congress for a simple yes-or-no vote, avoiding the complicated process of congressional markup that can prove a death sentence for trade pacts. A new Backgrounder examines the possible ramifications of TPA’s expiration, which takes effect June 30 unless Congress acts to renew or extend it. Free-trade advocates are concerned the loss of fast-track will jeopardize future trade negotiations. The United States currently has four bilateral agreements negotiated and awaiting congressional approval, and is undertaking bilateral negotiations with eight other countries (WSJ) including Thailand and Ecuador. It remains possible that many or all these potential partners will refuse to negotiate with the United States if the executive branch loses TPA, given that any agreement, once negotiated bilaterally, would face major revisions in Congress.
More generally, the expiration of fast-track underlines increasing U.S. ambivalence toward free trade, which promises to be a divisive issue in the 2008 U.S. presidential elections. A Foreign Affairs article notes a decided drift toward protectionism, particularly with respect to emerging China, while a new Council Special Report examines how the U.S. Trade Adjustment Assistance program might be reformed to better protect American jobs. Daniel T. Griswold, the director of the Center for Trade Policy Studies at the CATO Institute, says that abandoning TPA “sends a negative signal to the rest of the world that we’re confused on trade policy and temporarily bowing out of negotiations.” Yet Griswold adds that doomsday predictions go too far, noting that the expiration of fast-track “doesn’t raise any trade barrier—it only reduces the chance of lowering barriers.” Bhagwati too finds cause for hope, noting the evaporation of TPA could circularly spur progress: “I’m optimistic, for a perverse reason, which is that in our own self interest we will have to pass some form of fast-track. Otherwise we’ll be big sore losers in the world trade system.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.