home > by publication type > daily analysis > Trading on America’s Future
Email
| Prepared by: | Lee Hudson Teslik |
|---|
Support for U.S. farm subsidies threatens further trade liberalization (AP Images/Dave Schwarz/The Owatonna Peoples Press)
Free trade initiatives hit a series of speed bumps this summer as the Doha round of trade talks collapsed, President Bush’s trade promotion authority expired, and partisan bickering (NYT) threatened to doom deals already negotiated. The developments imperil a potentially sweeping trade deal with South Korea, a pact with U.S. ally Colombia, and two smaller agreements with Peru and Panama that just months ago seemed all but certain to gain congressional approval. With seventeen months left for the Bush administration, many experts say the president’s once-ambitious trade agenda is now derailed. All relevant parties remain entrenched, including Doha round negotiating partners India and Brazil, who seek substantial cuts in U.S. agricultural subsidies. The same is true for Bush’s domestic Democratic Party adversaries, who by and large seek to protect these subsidies, and to inject environmental and labor protections into bilateral agreements.
Notwithstanding the tough month for trade advocates, CFR's Jagdish N. Bhagwati argues in the Wall Street Journal that the outlook, at least with respect to Doha, might not be quite so gloomy. Bhagwati notes the “good news”—that the Doha negotiations, even if they ultimately fail to produce a deal, pushed through several contentious issues and narrowed discussions to a core group of participants.
The Doha round aside, however, American attitudes toward trade are turning grim. For a slew of reasons, including declining relative earnings for U.S. workers and high income inequality, U.S. protectionist sentiments (Foreign Affairs) seem to be on the rise. Fears of globalization remain particularly pointed within the agriculture and automobile industries, which potentially stand to suffer heavy job losses. The influence of Detroit’s big automakers, for instance, might bury the South Korea deal. Meanwhile, U.S. farm subsidies threaten to undermine broader multilateral agreements. Bhagwati, in a recent interview, says Americans are “minimalists” on concessions but “maximalists in making demands on others in terms of agriculture.”
Subsidies propping up U.S. farmers remain popular and deep cuts may not be politically viable. The U.S. Farm Bill expires in September, and while some signs indicate rising momentum in Congress to overhaul its subsidies, change will not come easily (AP). Reform is particularly challenging in an election year—trade liberalization, for all its benefits, fails to electrify the electorate like job-loss fears.
Analysts say U.S. trade policy is at a critical juncture. An IHT editorial argues congressional meddling in bipartisan agreements “may actually hinder the cause of global free trade, entangling the world in a web of incompatible rules.” Nor is it at all clear, in the long run, that protectionism is the best way to “protect” U.S. jobs. A report by New York’s Federal Reserve Bank concludes the threat of job loss due to trade liberalization is relatively small (PDF).
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.