Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Musharraf and his Labyrinth
| Prepared by: | Michael Moran |
|---|
Pakistani soldiers back on patrol in North Waziristan (AP Images/Abdullah Noor)
As the Pakistani government scrambles to salvage a peace accord (BosGlobe) with tribal leaders along the country’s lawless northwest frontier, unrest elsewhere in Pakistan has raised new questions about the stability of Pervez Musharraf’s military government. The ten-month-old truce, known as the Miramshah Agreement, was viewed at the beginning by some critics as a capitulation (ABC) after Pakistani troops suffered heavy casualties in trying to impose order on the region. This CFR.org Interactive Map looks at the historically ungovernable region.
The Miramshah agreement compelled Pakistan to withdraw troops from the region, a stronghold of Pakistan’s Taliban as well as the most likely location of al-Qaeda’s leadership. In theory, Musharraf and Bush administration officials argue the truce would convert the prickly tribal chieftains, whose long history of resistance to central government rule is detailed in this Backgrounder, into allies against radical Islamists. In fact, as a new National Intelligence Estimate, makes clear, al-Qaeda and its allies instead have thrived in the vacuum (LAT).
The new U.S. intelligence assessment can only add to the general’s labyrinthine woes. The Dawn, an influential Pakistani newspaper, opines that Musharraf’s problems in facing down violence range from public perception to “the inability of President Musharraf to find the right political allies to support [his actions]. No matter what the President says about the anti-terrorism policy being home-grown, most people in the country believe whatever action he is taking is under American pressure.” Washington has, indeed, demanded action. Since 2001, the United States has provided at least $10 billion in military and civilian funding, and as CFR South Asia Fellow Daniel Markey notes, the Bush administration wants to add another $785 million to the 2008 budget (IHT). Following the NIE’s publication, U.S. officials broke ranks with Pakistan on the value of the tribal policy, with Richard Boucher, assistant secretary of state for South and Central Asia, suggesting it was time for Pakistan’s army to step in again (WashTimes).
But deeper questions about the heavy U.S. reliance on Pakistan’s general swirl in Washington. At contentious hearings (PDF) in March at the House Foreign Affairs Committee, some lawmakers concluded the general should allow a genuine election—one in which he would not be a candidate. But George Perkovich from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace argues against casting democracy as a silver bullet in Pakistan or elsewhere. “'People on the right and the left will say: 'You're just going to repeat the same mistake as Iraq’” (NYT). Markey makes a similar case in a recent Foreign Affairs article. The NIE also provides fuel for those who regard the Iraq war as a distraction from the fight against those behind 9/11, assertsNewsweek's Michael Hirsh.
Meanwhile, Musharraf’s problems domestically loom ever larger. Beyond the militant Islamist challenge along the Afghan border, a recent spate of violence has shaken Pakistan’s cities, including the highly publicized standoff between Pakistani troops and Islamist militants at Islamabad’s Red Mosque (NYT). More generally, Musharraf has drawn criticism from both sides of the country’s polarized political spectrum, especially over his decision to suspend Pakistan’s Supreme Court Justice, Iftikhar Chaudhry. In apodcast, CFR Fellow Manjeet Kripalani explores the motives behind that decision.
This Backgrounder examines how some experts believe Pakistan may look after Musharraf leaves the stage. Frederick Grare, another Carnegie expert,says in a recent analysis there cannot be a meaningful change to a system that hosts and nurtures jihadists “without the end of military domination of Pakistan.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
