Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Musharraf and his Labyrinth
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Pakistani soldiers back on patrol in North Waziristan (AP Images/Abdullah Noor)
As the Pakistani government scrambles to salvage a peace accord (BosGlobe) with tribal leaders along the country’s lawless northwest frontier, unrest elsewhere in Pakistan has raised new questions about the stability of Pervez Musharraf’s military government. The ten-month-old truce, known as the Miramshah Agreement, was viewed at the beginning by some critics as a capitulation (ABC) after Pakistani troops suffered heavy casualties in trying to impose order on the region. This CFR.org Interactive Map looks at the historically ungovernable region.
The Miramshah agreement compelled Pakistan to withdraw troops from the region, a stronghold of Pakistan’s Taliban as well as the most likely location of al-Qaeda’s leadership. In theory, Musharraf and Bush administration officials argue the truce would convert the prickly tribal chieftains, whose long history of resistance to central government rule is detailed in this Backgrounder, into allies against radical Islamists. In fact, as a new National Intelligence Estimate, makes clear, al-Qaeda and its allies instead have thrived in the vacuum (LAT).
The new U.S. intelligence assessment can only add to the general’s labyrinthine woes. The Dawn, an influential Pakistani newspaper, opines that Musharraf’s problems in facing down violence range from public perception to “the inability of President Musharraf to find the right political allies to support [his actions]. No matter what the President says about the anti-terrorism policy being home-grown, most people in the country believe whatever action he is taking is under American pressure.” Washington has, indeed, demanded action. Since 2001, the United States has provided at least $10 billion in military and civilian funding, and as CFR South Asia Fellow Daniel Markey notes, the Bush administration wants to add another $785 million to the 2008 budget (IHT). Following the NIE’s publication, U.S. officials broke ranks with Pakistan on the value of the tribal policy, with Richard Boucher, assistant secretary of state for South and Central Asia, suggesting it was time for Pakistan’s army to step in again (WashTimes).
But deeper questions about the heavy U.S. reliance on Pakistan’s general swirl in Washington. At contentious hearings (PDF) in March at the House Foreign Affairs Committee, some lawmakers concluded the general should allow a genuine election—one in which he would not be a candidate. But George Perkovich from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace argues against casting democracy as a silver bullet in Pakistan or elsewhere. “'People on the right and the left will say: 'You're just going to repeat the same mistake as Iraq’” (NYT). Markey makes a similar case in a recent Foreign Affairs article. The NIE also provides fuel for those who regard the Iraq war as a distraction from the fight against those behind 9/11, assertsNewsweek's Michael Hirsh.
Meanwhile, Musharraf’s problems domestically loom ever larger. Beyond the militant Islamist challenge along the Afghan border, a recent spate of violence has shaken Pakistan’s cities, including the highly publicized standoff between Pakistani troops and Islamist militants at Islamabad’s Red Mosque (NYT). More generally, Musharraf has drawn criticism from both sides of the country’s polarized political spectrum, especially over his decision to suspend Pakistan’s Supreme Court Justice, Iftikhar Chaudhry. In apodcast, CFR Fellow Manjeet Kripalani explores the motives behind that decision.
This Backgrounder examines how some experts believe Pakistan may look after Musharraf leaves the stage. Frederick Grare, another Carnegie expert,says in a recent analysis there cannot be a meaningful change to a system that hosts and nurtures jihadists “without the end of military domination of Pakistan.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In The Closing of the American Border, Edward Alden goes behind the scenes to tell the story of the Bush administration’s struggle to balance security and openness in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
Foreign Affairs has compiled a collection of articles that offer policy prescriptions to some of the world's most pressing problems.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
