Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > In Africa, Hunting for Elusive Peace
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Somalian President Abdulahi Yusuf, right, during the opening of an dispiriting peace conference in Mogadishu. (AP Images/ Mohamed Abdulle Hassan Siidi)
Cote d’Ivoire lit a symbolic “flame of peace” (BBC) this month in Bouake, its second-largest city. Fueling the flame were weapons used in the country’s civil war (Mail & Guardian). Meant to embody the nation’s reunification, the ceremony instead emphasizes the fragile nature of peace in Cote d’Ivoire. The event was scheduled to take place in June, but it was delayed by an assassination attempt on the prime minister, former rebel leader Guillaume Soro (Economist).
A failed 2002 coup (AlertNet) divided Cote d’Ivoire between north and south and sparked a rebellion against the government. The March peace deal between Soro and President Laurent Gbagbo follows a series of failed efforts led by international mediators. The new deal sets an aggressive timetable for disarming rebels and organizing elections. Many see signs of hope in the deal’s “homegrown” nature, but an International Crisis Group report calls it “more a deal between two sides looking for an escape route that protects their own interests than a compromise which guarantees lasting peace.”
Still, the peace agreement in Cote d'Ivoire stands in contrast to a number of troubled peace efforts in Africa. Internally resolving conflicts in Darfur and Somalia appears implausible, but international brokers are stymied. Current mediation efforts have become fractured, unlike successful international initiatives that brought peace to Sierra Leone and Southern Sudan. While the United Nations moves forward with a draft resolution authorizing a hybrid peacekeeping force (AP) in Darfur, several regional actors are pursuing competing agendas for peace negotiations. A United Nations/African Union-led conference scheduled for early August in Tanzania aims to unite Darfur’s fragmented rebel groups around a common position. Most experts agree the UN/AU initiative offers the best opportunity for progress, but as this Backgrounder discusses, the barriers to a negotiated settlement are substantial. “This is a group [of rebels] that makes the Somalis look well organized,” (CSMonitor) says Harvard's Alex de Waal.
Prospects also seem grim for peace in Somalia, where there is no international presence at a much-delayed national reconciliation conference. Gunfire and mortar explosions (Garowe Online) on the streets of Mogadishu threaten to derail (WashPost) the nearly one thousand delegates from a plethora of clans and subclans from discussing revenue sharing and representation. The security situation is so dire that aid workers can’t even enter (NPR) the country. Most observers think the conference has little hope for success, especially because the factions perpetrating violence refuse to attend. The boycott by opposition groups “places a hard limit on the amount of stability the conference will be able to produce,” writes Daveed Gartenstein-Ross on Counterterrorism Blog. Somalia’s transitional federal government (TFG), a body created by the United Nations, has little support among the general population and looks unlikely to strengthen its position now. Jennifer Cooke of the Center for Strategic and International Studies argues that the United States should use its “dwindling leverage” to push for the TFG to create an inclusive reconciliation process and to build an international approach to Somalia that goes beyond counterterrorism concerns.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
